Purpose: Post mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality for selected patients. Bolus overcomes the skin-sparing effect of external-beam radiotherapy, ensuring adequate dose to superficial regions at risk of local recurrence (LR). This systematic review summarizes the current evidence regarding the impact of bolus on LR and acute toxicity in the setting of PMRT. Results: 27 studies were included. The use of bolus led to higher rates of acute grade 3 radiation dermatitis (pooled rates of 9.6% with bolus vs. 1.2% without). Pooled crude LR rates from thirteen studies (n = 3756) were similar with (3.5%) and without (3.6%) bolus. Conclusions: Bolus may be indicated in cases with a high risk of LR in the skin, but seems not to be necessary for all patients. Further work is needed to define the role of bolus in PMRT.

The use of bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review / Dahn H.M.; Boersma L.J.; de Ruysscher D.; Meattini I.; Offersen B.V.; Pignol J.-P.; Aristei C.; Belkacemi Y.; Benjamin D.; Bese N.; Coles C.E.; Franco P.; Ho A.; Hol S.; Jagsi R.; Kirby A.M.; Marrazzo L.; Marta G.N.; Moran M.S.; Nichol A.M.; Nissen H.D.; Strnad V.; Zissiadis Y.E.; Poortmans P.; Kaidar-Person O.. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - ELETTRONICO. - 163:(2021), pp. 0-0. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103391]

The use of bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review

Meattini I.;Marrazzo L.;
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Post mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality for selected patients. Bolus overcomes the skin-sparing effect of external-beam radiotherapy, ensuring adequate dose to superficial regions at risk of local recurrence (LR). This systematic review summarizes the current evidence regarding the impact of bolus on LR and acute toxicity in the setting of PMRT. Results: 27 studies were included. The use of bolus led to higher rates of acute grade 3 radiation dermatitis (pooled rates of 9.6% with bolus vs. 1.2% without). Pooled crude LR rates from thirteen studies (n = 3756) were similar with (3.5%) and without (3.6%) bolus. Conclusions: Bolus may be indicated in cases with a high risk of LR in the skin, but seems not to be necessary for all patients. Further work is needed to define the role of bolus in PMRT.
2021
163
0
0
Dahn H.M.; Boersma L.J.; de Ruysscher D.; Meattini I.; Offersen B.V.; Pignol J.-P.; Aristei C.; Belkacemi Y.; Benjamin D.; Bese N.; Coles C.E.; Franco P.; Ho A.; Hol S.; Jagsi R.; Kirby A.M.; Marrazzo L.; Marta G.N.; Moran M.S.; Nichol A.M.; Nissen H.D.; Strnad V.; Zissiadis Y.E.; Poortmans P.; Kaidar-Person O.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_Dahn et al_CROH_bolus systematic review.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1244828
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact