In contrast to harmonized international food quality standards, local producers of food that is protected as geographical indication can adapt production rules. In a comparative multi-method case study approach, we analyse how constitutional and collective choice rules affect the negotiation of diverse interests and the adaptability of food quality standards in France, Italy and Austria. In France, a national organisation with a plurality of technical expertise guarantees the coherence of geographical indications based on notions of terroir and heritage. Italy’s rural development approach secures very elaborated voting rules for producer groups and broader interaction on the regional level to accomplish broadly legitimated decisions. In the Austrian intellectual property rights approach, producers self-define the constitutional and collective choice rules and have the fullest autonomy and responsibility in standard setting. We conclude that polycentric interlinkages across scales and sectors – though delaying adaptation – support the long-term conservation of the products’ identity via broad legitimisation. Both, the autonomy of local producers to innovatively adapt to change as well as a strong product identity are key for the long-term viability of geographical indications.
Polycentric structures nurturing adaptive food quality governance - Lessons learned from geographical indications in the European Union / Penker, Marianne; Scaramuzzi, Silvia; Edelmann, Hanna; Belletti, Giovanni; Marescotti, Andrea; Casabianca, François; Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F.. - In: JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES. - ISSN 0743-0167. - ELETTRONICO. - 89:(2022), pp. 208-221. [10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.023]
Polycentric structures nurturing adaptive food quality governance - Lessons learned from geographical indications in the European Union
Scaramuzzi, Silvia
;Belletti, Giovanni;Marescotti, Andrea;
2022
Abstract
In contrast to harmonized international food quality standards, local producers of food that is protected as geographical indication can adapt production rules. In a comparative multi-method case study approach, we analyse how constitutional and collective choice rules affect the negotiation of diverse interests and the adaptability of food quality standards in France, Italy and Austria. In France, a national organisation with a plurality of technical expertise guarantees the coherence of geographical indications based on notions of terroir and heritage. Italy’s rural development approach secures very elaborated voting rules for producer groups and broader interaction on the regional level to accomplish broadly legitimated decisions. In the Austrian intellectual property rights approach, producers self-define the constitutional and collective choice rules and have the fullest autonomy and responsibility in standard setting. We conclude that polycentric interlinkages across scales and sectors – though delaying adaptation – support the long-term conservation of the products’ identity via broad legitimisation. Both, the autonomy of local producers to innovatively adapt to change as well as a strong product identity are key for the long-term viability of geographical indications.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0743016721003570-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
1.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.