A comparison between commercial cellulose evaporative cooling pad and pads manufactured with three alternative materials was made for environmental conditions typical of tropical countries. Wind tunnel tests were carried out to compute the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients and to measure the pressure drop across each pad, obtaining expressions that can be used as reference for future simulations. Using a mathematical model, a detailed analysis of the efficiency, Temperature–Humidity Index, temperature drop and relative humidity through the pads was performed in terms of different operative and constructive conditions, such as air velocities, dry-bulb temperatures, relative humidity and pad thickness. Significant differences between the pressure drop across the pads were found, which increases with the inlet air velocity and water flow. A weak relation between the analysed variables and the inlet air velocity was found, while a high correlation between the analysed variables, pad thickness and the external environmental conditions was established. Cooling efficiencies above 40% and a Temperature–Humidity Index below the mild zone of thermal stress were obtained for the alternative panels. Although the cellulose cooling pad showed the best behaviour in all aspects, the alternative pads can be used as substituted in specific applications to reduce the Temperature–Humidity Index inside agricultural facilities.

Comparative Analysis of the Cooling Efficiency in Tropical Climate of Three Alternative Materials for Evaporative Cooling Pads / Obando Vega, Felipe Andrés; Montoya Rios, Ana Paola; Osorio Saraz, Jairo Alexander; Damasceno, Flávio Alves; Barbari, Matteo. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - ELETTRONICO. - 12:(2021), pp. 1-29. [10.3390/app12010077]

Comparative Analysis of the Cooling Efficiency in Tropical Climate of Three Alternative Materials for Evaporative Cooling Pads

Barbari, Matteo
2021

Abstract

A comparison between commercial cellulose evaporative cooling pad and pads manufactured with three alternative materials was made for environmental conditions typical of tropical countries. Wind tunnel tests were carried out to compute the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients and to measure the pressure drop across each pad, obtaining expressions that can be used as reference for future simulations. Using a mathematical model, a detailed analysis of the efficiency, Temperature–Humidity Index, temperature drop and relative humidity through the pads was performed in terms of different operative and constructive conditions, such as air velocities, dry-bulb temperatures, relative humidity and pad thickness. Significant differences between the pressure drop across the pads were found, which increases with the inlet air velocity and water flow. A weak relation between the analysed variables and the inlet air velocity was found, while a high correlation between the analysed variables, pad thickness and the external environmental conditions was established. Cooling efficiencies above 40% and a Temperature–Humidity Index below the mild zone of thermal stress were obtained for the alternative panels. Although the cellulose cooling pad showed the best behaviour in all aspects, the alternative pads can be used as substituted in specific applications to reduce the Temperature–Humidity Index inside agricultural facilities.
2021
12
1
29
Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Obando Vega, Felipe Andrés; Montoya Rios, Ana Paola; Osorio Saraz, Jairo Alexander; Damasceno, Flávio Alves; Barbari, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
applsci-12-00077_compressed (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Pubblicazione finale
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1253684
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact