The aim of this study was to investigate the usability levels of some pulmonary ventilators during emergency pandemic caused by COVID-19 for some hospitals of Tuscany Region. The study involved 30 anesthetists with varying age and experience, 5 hospitals of Tuscany Region and 3 different model of pulmonary ventilators. To quantify the usability levels of medical devices the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used. The PSSQU was submitted to the operators using the Google Forms platform. This tool allowed us to asses user satisfaction for 4 different dimensions of usability: Overall PSSQU (user satisfaction), system usefulness (SYUSE), information quality (INFOQUAL) and interface quality (INTERQUAL). Overall, the PSSQU subscale scores show a high overall usability. The results indicate a positive reliability of the pulmonary ventilators studied, although for 2 out of 30 subjects surveyed, the PSSQU subscale score is less than 50%. The PSSQU proved to be a replicable tool for the different ventilator models in use in hospitals, and effective for measuring the usability of pulmonary ventilators, including performance, usability problems and user satisfaction. The results, although on average high, highlight the need for doctors to have: clearer and more detailed error messages, more usable and less chaotic graphic user interface (GUI), lighter and more intuitive mechanical ventilators during assembly and disassembly of components.

An analysis of Usability levels of ventilators during Covid-19: a case study / Mattia Pistolesi; Stefano Bellucci;. - ELETTRONICO. - Volume IV: Healthcare and Healthy Work:(2021), pp. 429-437. (Intervento presentato al convegno Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International ergonomics Association (IEA2021) tenutosi a Online nel 13-18 June) [10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_59].

An analysis of Usability levels of ventilators during Covid-19: a case study

Mattia Pistolesi
;
2021

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the usability levels of some pulmonary ventilators during emergency pandemic caused by COVID-19 for some hospitals of Tuscany Region. The study involved 30 anesthetists with varying age and experience, 5 hospitals of Tuscany Region and 3 different model of pulmonary ventilators. To quantify the usability levels of medical devices the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used. The PSSQU was submitted to the operators using the Google Forms platform. This tool allowed us to asses user satisfaction for 4 different dimensions of usability: Overall PSSQU (user satisfaction), system usefulness (SYUSE), information quality (INFOQUAL) and interface quality (INTERQUAL). Overall, the PSSQU subscale scores show a high overall usability. The results indicate a positive reliability of the pulmonary ventilators studied, although for 2 out of 30 subjects surveyed, the PSSQU subscale score is less than 50%. The PSSQU proved to be a replicable tool for the different ventilator models in use in hospitals, and effective for measuring the usability of pulmonary ventilators, including performance, usability problems and user satisfaction. The results, although on average high, highlight the need for doctors to have: clearer and more detailed error messages, more usable and less chaotic graphic user interface (GUI), lighter and more intuitive mechanical ventilators during assembly and disassembly of components.
2021
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 222
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International ergonomics Association (IEA2021)
Online
13-18 June
Mattia Pistolesi; Stefano Bellucci;
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pistolesi, Bellucci IEA 2021.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 2.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.35 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1256711
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact