Antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) have been recognized for over 40 years and have been important in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), and its recognition in patients of different ages and thymic pathologies. The 10–20% of patients who do not have AChR antibodies are now known to comprise different subgroups, the most commonly reported of which is patients with antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). The use of cell-based assays has extended the repertoire of antibody tests to clustered AChRs, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4, and agrin. Autoantibodies against intracellular targets, namely cortactin, titin, and ryanodine receptor (the latter two being associated with the presence of thymoma), may also be helpful as biomarkers in some patients. IgG4 MuSK antibodies are clearly pathogenic, but the coexisting IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 antibodies, collectively, have effects that question the dominance of IgG4 as the sole pathologic factor in MuSK MG. After a brief historical review, we define the different subgroups and summarize the antibody characteristics. Experiments to demonstrate the in vitro and in vivo pathogenic roles of MuSK antibodies are discussed.

Serological and experimental studies in different forms of myasthenia gravis / Vincent A.; Huda S.; Cao M.; Cetin H.; Koneczny I.; Rodriguez-Cruz P.; Jacobson L.; Viegas S.; Jacob S.; Woodhall M.; Nagaishi A.; Maniaol A.; Damato V.; Leite M.I.; Cossins J.; Webster R.; Palace J.; Beeson D.. - In: ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. - ISSN 0077-8923. - ELETTRONICO. - 1413:(2018), pp. 143-153. [10.1111/nyas.13592]

Serological and experimental studies in different forms of myasthenia gravis

Damato V.;
2018

Abstract

Antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) have been recognized for over 40 years and have been important in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), and its recognition in patients of different ages and thymic pathologies. The 10–20% of patients who do not have AChR antibodies are now known to comprise different subgroups, the most commonly reported of which is patients with antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). The use of cell-based assays has extended the repertoire of antibody tests to clustered AChRs, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4, and agrin. Autoantibodies against intracellular targets, namely cortactin, titin, and ryanodine receptor (the latter two being associated with the presence of thymoma), may also be helpful as biomarkers in some patients. IgG4 MuSK antibodies are clearly pathogenic, but the coexisting IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 antibodies, collectively, have effects that question the dominance of IgG4 as the sole pathologic factor in MuSK MG. After a brief historical review, we define the different subgroups and summarize the antibody characteristics. Experiments to demonstrate the in vitro and in vivo pathogenic roles of MuSK antibodies are discussed.
2018
1413
143
153
Vincent A.; Huda S.; Cao M.; Cetin H.; Koneczny I.; Rodriguez-Cruz P.; Jacobson L.; Viegas S.; Jacob S.; Woodhall M.; Nagaishi A.; Maniaol A.; Damato V.; Leite M.I.; Cossins J.; Webster R.; Palace J.; Beeson D.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nyas.13592.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 531.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
531.23 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1257915
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact