In this study, we present atmospheric ice- nucleating particle (INP) concentrations from the Gruvebadet (GVB) observatory in Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard). All aerosol particle sampling activities were conducted in April– August 2018. Ambient INP concentrations (nINP) were measured for aerosol particles collected on filter samples by means of two offline instruments: the Dynamic Filter Processing Chamber (DFPC) and the West Texas Cryogenic Refrigerator Applied to Freezing Test system (WT-CRAFT) to assess condensation and immersion freezing, respectively. DFPC measured nINPs for a set of filters collected through two size-segregated inlets: one for transmitting particulate matter of less than 1 μm (PM1 ), the other for particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μm aerodynamic diameter (PM10). Overall, nINPPM10 measured by DFPC at a water saturation ratio of 1.02 ranged from 3 to 185 m−3 at temperatures (T s) of −15 to −22 °C. On average, the super-micrometer INP (nINPPM10 − nINPPM1 ) accounted for approximately 20 %–30 % of nINPPM10 in spring, increasing in summer to 45% at −22°C and 65% at −15°C. This increase in super-micrometer INP fraction towards summer suggests that super-micrometer aerosol particles play an important role as the source of INPs in the Arctic. For the same T range, WT-CRAFT measured 1 to 199 m−3 . Although the two nINP datasets were in general agreement, a notable nINP offset was observed, particularly at −15°C. Interestingly, the results of both DFPC and WT-CRAFT measurements did not show a sharp increase in nINP from spring to summer. While an increase was observed in a subset of our data (WT-CRAFT, between −18 and −21 °C), the spring-to- summer nINP enhancement ratios never exceeded a factor of 3. More evident seasonal variability was found, however, in our activated fraction (AF) data, calculated by scaling the measured nINP to the total aerosol particle concentration. In 2018, AF increased from spring to summer. This seasonal AF trend corresponds to the overall decrease in aerosol concentration towards summer and a concomitant increase in the contribution of super-micrometer particles. Indeed, the AF of coarse particles resulted markedly higher than that of sub- micrometer ones (2 orders of magnitude). Analysis of low- traveling back-trajectories and meteorological conditions at GVB matched to our INP data suggests that the summertime INP population is influenced by both terrestrial (snow-free land) and marine sources. Our spatiotemporal analyses of satellite-retrieved chlorophyll a, as well as spatial source attribution, indicate that the maritime INPs at GVB may come from the seawaters surrounding the Svalbard archipelago and/or in proximity to Greenland and Iceland during the observation period. Nevertheless, further analyses, performed on larger datasets, would be necessary to reach firmer and more general conclusions.

Ice-nucleating particle concentration measurements from Ny-Ålesund during the Arctic spring–summer in 2018 / Matteo Rinaldi, Naruki Hiranuma, Gianni Santachiara, Mauro Mazzola, Karam Mansour, Marco Paglione, Cheyanne A. Rodriguez, Rita Traversi, Silvia Becagli, David Cappelletti, and Franco Belosi. - In: ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS. - ISSN 1680-7316. - ELETTRONICO. - 21:(2021), pp. 14725-14748.

Ice-nucleating particle concentration measurements from Ny-Ålesund during the Arctic spring–summer in 2018

Rita Traversi;Silvia Becagli;
2021

Abstract

In this study, we present atmospheric ice- nucleating particle (INP) concentrations from the Gruvebadet (GVB) observatory in Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard). All aerosol particle sampling activities were conducted in April– August 2018. Ambient INP concentrations (nINP) were measured for aerosol particles collected on filter samples by means of two offline instruments: the Dynamic Filter Processing Chamber (DFPC) and the West Texas Cryogenic Refrigerator Applied to Freezing Test system (WT-CRAFT) to assess condensation and immersion freezing, respectively. DFPC measured nINPs for a set of filters collected through two size-segregated inlets: one for transmitting particulate matter of less than 1 μm (PM1 ), the other for particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μm aerodynamic diameter (PM10). Overall, nINPPM10 measured by DFPC at a water saturation ratio of 1.02 ranged from 3 to 185 m−3 at temperatures (T s) of −15 to −22 °C. On average, the super-micrometer INP (nINPPM10 − nINPPM1 ) accounted for approximately 20 %–30 % of nINPPM10 in spring, increasing in summer to 45% at −22°C and 65% at −15°C. This increase in super-micrometer INP fraction towards summer suggests that super-micrometer aerosol particles play an important role as the source of INPs in the Arctic. For the same T range, WT-CRAFT measured 1 to 199 m−3 . Although the two nINP datasets were in general agreement, a notable nINP offset was observed, particularly at −15°C. Interestingly, the results of both DFPC and WT-CRAFT measurements did not show a sharp increase in nINP from spring to summer. While an increase was observed in a subset of our data (WT-CRAFT, between −18 and −21 °C), the spring-to- summer nINP enhancement ratios never exceeded a factor of 3. More evident seasonal variability was found, however, in our activated fraction (AF) data, calculated by scaling the measured nINP to the total aerosol particle concentration. In 2018, AF increased from spring to summer. This seasonal AF trend corresponds to the overall decrease in aerosol concentration towards summer and a concomitant increase in the contribution of super-micrometer particles. Indeed, the AF of coarse particles resulted markedly higher than that of sub- micrometer ones (2 orders of magnitude). Analysis of low- traveling back-trajectories and meteorological conditions at GVB matched to our INP data suggests that the summertime INP population is influenced by both terrestrial (snow-free land) and marine sources. Our spatiotemporal analyses of satellite-retrieved chlorophyll a, as well as spatial source attribution, indicate that the maritime INPs at GVB may come from the seawaters surrounding the Svalbard archipelago and/or in proximity to Greenland and Iceland during the observation period. Nevertheless, further analyses, performed on larger datasets, would be necessary to reach firmer and more general conclusions.
2021
21
14725
14748
Matteo Rinaldi, Naruki Hiranuma, Gianni Santachiara, Mauro Mazzola, Karam Mansour, Marco Paglione, Cheyanne A. Rodriguez, Rita Traversi, Silvia Becagli, David Cappelletti, and Franco Belosi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Rinaldi21 INP NyA 2018 - ACP.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 4.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.83 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1258299
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact