We study how commitment of entrepreneurs to sustainability practices might effectively improve the social and environmental impact of market competition. To this end we devised a market experiment in which profit maximization and socially and environmentally concerned behavior were both potential goals of producers. Our subject pool included two distinct types of students having different prosocial attitudes. The two types adopted significantly different strategies in the treatment group, where producers could contribute to a positive externality, whereas they behaved similarly in the control group, where the only objective was profit maximization. Subjects who were ex-ante more prosocial chose to produce with more focus on the positive externality than their counterparts. However, they failed to actually deliver a larger social impact as a consequence of the market outcome. We conclude that producers often commit to social responsibility, even though well-meaning conducts do not necessarily beget equally good outcomes.
Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Good Deeds, Business, Social and Environmental Responsibility in a Market Experiment / Biggeri, Mario; Colucci, Domenico; Doni, Nicola; Valori, Vincenzo. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:(2022), pp. 1-20. [10.3390/su14063577]
Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Good Deeds, Business, Social and Environmental Responsibility in a Market Experiment
Biggeri, Mario;Colucci, Domenico;Doni, Nicola;Valori, Vincenzo
2022
Abstract
We study how commitment of entrepreneurs to sustainability practices might effectively improve the social and environmental impact of market competition. To this end we devised a market experiment in which profit maximization and socially and environmentally concerned behavior were both potential goals of producers. Our subject pool included two distinct types of students having different prosocial attitudes. The two types adopted significantly different strategies in the treatment group, where producers could contribute to a positive externality, whereas they behaved similarly in the control group, where the only objective was profit maximization. Subjects who were ex-ante more prosocial chose to produce with more focus on the positive externality than their counterparts. However, they failed to actually deliver a larger social impact as a consequence of the market outcome. We conclude that producers often commit to social responsibility, even though well-meaning conducts do not necessarily beget equally good outcomes.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
sustainability-14-03577.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
913.54 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
913.54 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.