In this paper, the effect of different control strategies on the output power and conversion efficiency for a Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter is presented. The four analyzed control strategies are the Single Phase Shift (SPS), the Extended Phase Shift (EPS), the Dual Phase Shift (DPS) and the Triple Phase shift (TPS). The analytical expressions of the output power for each control strategy are presented. The output power range of each control is evaluated for a particular case study. A comparison in terms of efficiency is discussed.
Comparison of Control Strategies for Dual Active Bridge Converter / Corti F.; Bertolini V.; Reatti A.; Cardelli E.; Giallongo M.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2022), pp. 902-907. (Intervento presentato al convegno MELECON 2022) [10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9843012].
Comparison of Control Strategies for Dual Active Bridge Converter
Corti F.;Reatti A.;
2022
Abstract
In this paper, the effect of different control strategies on the output power and conversion efficiency for a Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter is presented. The four analyzed control strategies are the Single Phase Shift (SPS), the Extended Phase Shift (EPS), the Dual Phase Shift (DPS) and the Triple Phase shift (TPS). The analytical expressions of the output power for each control strategy are presented. The output power range of each control is evaluated for a particular case study. A comparison in terms of efficiency is discussed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Comparison_of_Control_Strategies_for_Dual_Active_Bridge_Converter.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
864.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
864.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.