This article reconfigures Merleau-Ponty’s “Problem of Passivity” into the potential of passivity. It contributes to Claude Lefort’s strong claims that Merleau-Ponty’s 'Passivity course' from 1954-1955 published in the volume of course notes "Institution and Passivity" (2010) provides an «attack against the root of modern ontology», and that the phenomenon of passivity has largely been «neglected by most philoso-phers». Reflected in these assertions is a 21st century perspective on Merleau-Ponty’s work, with relevance to current performative, corporeal and political re-workings of phenomenology. The article’s aim is to chart how Merleau-Ponty’s work on passivity, sleep and the unconscious represents a powerful critique of the Husserlian intentional model and the phenomenological concept of constitution, at the same time as opening potential for viewing consciousness as plural, culturally situated and diffracted.

The Potential of Passivity beyond the Intentional Model: Consciousness as Disarticulation in Merleau-Ponty's "Institution and Passivity" / Federica Buongiorno; Susan Kozel. - In: HUMANA.MENTE. - ISSN 1972-1293. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:(2022), pp. 121-148.

The Potential of Passivity beyond the Intentional Model: Consciousness as Disarticulation in Merleau-Ponty's "Institution and Passivity"

Federica Buongiorno;
2022

Abstract

This article reconfigures Merleau-Ponty’s “Problem of Passivity” into the potential of passivity. It contributes to Claude Lefort’s strong claims that Merleau-Ponty’s 'Passivity course' from 1954-1955 published in the volume of course notes "Institution and Passivity" (2010) provides an «attack against the root of modern ontology», and that the phenomenon of passivity has largely been «neglected by most philoso-phers». Reflected in these assertions is a 21st century perspective on Merleau-Ponty’s work, with relevance to current performative, corporeal and political re-workings of phenomenology. The article’s aim is to chart how Merleau-Ponty’s work on passivity, sleep and the unconscious represents a powerful critique of the Husserlian intentional model and the phenomenological concept of constitution, at the same time as opening potential for viewing consciousness as plural, culturally situated and diffracted.
15
121
148
Federica Buongiorno; Susan Kozel
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
HM2022.Buongiorno_Kozel.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 479.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
479.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1282337
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact