Hip megaprostheses are a long known reconstructive method in the treatment of proximal femur metastases. The use of cemented or uncemented stems is still matter of debate. The aim of this study to compare cemented and uncemented megaprostheses on functional outcomes and complications, in order to establish the role of cementation.
Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study / Oliva, Maria Serena; Muratori, Francesco; Vitiello, Raffaele; Ziranu, Antonio; Foschi, Lorenzo; Rovere, Giuseppe; Meschini, Cesare; Campanacci, Domenico Andrea; Maccauro, Giulio. - In: BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. - ISSN 1471-2474. - STAMPA. - 22:(2022), pp. 0-0. [10.1186/s12891-022-05726-7]
Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study
Foschi, Lorenzo;Campanacci, Domenico Andrea;
2022
Abstract
Hip megaprostheses are a long known reconstructive method in the treatment of proximal femur metastases. The use of cemented or uncemented stems is still matter of debate. The aim of this study to compare cemented and uncemented megaprostheses on functional outcomes and complications, in order to establish the role of cementation.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s12891-022-05726-7.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
1.26 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
