Hip megaprostheses are a long known reconstructive method in the treatment of proximal femur metastases. The use of cemented or uncemented stems is still matter of debate. The aim of this study to compare cemented and uncemented megaprostheses on functional outcomes and complications, in order to establish the role of cementation.

Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study / Oliva, Maria Serena; Muratori, Francesco; Vitiello, Raffaele; Ziranu, Antonio; Foschi, Lorenzo; Rovere, Giuseppe; Meschini, Cesare; Campanacci, Domenico Andrea; Maccauro, Giulio. - In: BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. - ISSN 1471-2474. - STAMPA. - 22:(2022), pp. 0-0. [10.1186/s12891-022-05726-7]

Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study

Foschi, Lorenzo;Campanacci, Domenico Andrea;
2022

Abstract

Hip megaprostheses are a long known reconstructive method in the treatment of proximal femur metastases. The use of cemented or uncemented stems is still matter of debate. The aim of this study to compare cemented and uncemented megaprostheses on functional outcomes and complications, in order to establish the role of cementation.
22
0
0
Oliva, Maria Serena; Muratori, Francesco; Vitiello, Raffaele; Ziranu, Antonio; Foschi, Lorenzo; Rovere, Giuseppe; Meschini, Cesare; Campanacci, Domenico Andrea; Maccauro, Giulio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1286513
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact