Despite minimally invasive techniques have gained wider clinical application in cardiac surgery, current evidence on mini thoracic aortic surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare early and mid–term outcomes of patients undergoing proximal thoracic aortic interventions through mini–sternotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS).
C13 COMPARISON OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THORACIC AORTIC OPERATIONS: EARLY AND MID–TERM RESULTS IN A SERIES OF 624 PATIENTS / Berretta, P; Galeazzi, M; Chiuselli, G; Codecasa, R; Alfonsi, J; Braconi, L; Rapisarda, F; Bonacchi, M; Malvindi, P; Stefano, P; Di Eusanio, M. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS. - ISSN 1520-765X. - STAMPA. - 24:(2022), pp. 7-8. [10.1093/eurheartj/suac011.012]
C13 COMPARISON OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THORACIC AORTIC OPERATIONS: EARLY AND MID–TERM RESULTS IN A SERIES OF 624 PATIENTS
Galeazzi, M;Chiuselli, G;Codecasa, R;Bonacchi, M;Stefano, P;
2022
Abstract
Despite minimally invasive techniques have gained wider clinical application in cardiac surgery, current evidence on mini thoracic aortic surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare early and mid–term outcomes of patients undergoing proximal thoracic aortic interventions through mini–sternotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS).
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
suac011.012.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: full-text
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
123.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
123.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
