BackgroundIntraoperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) was introduced to titrate intravenous fluids, with or without inotropic drugs, based on objective measures of hypovolaemia and cardiac output measurements to improve organ perfusion. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of GDT on the recovery of bowel function after abdominal surgery. MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases were searched for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, from January 1989 to June 2013, that compared patients who did, or did not, receive intraoperative GDT, and reported outcomes on the recovery of bowel function. Time to first flatus and first bowel motion, time to tolerate oral diet, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and primary postoperative ileus were included. ResultsThirteen trials with 1399 patients were included in the analysis. GDT shortened the time to the first bowel motion (weighted mean difference (WMD -067, 95 per cent c.i. -123 to -011; P=0020) and time to tolerate oral intake (WMD -095, -181 to -010; P=0030), and reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk difference -015, -026 to -003; P=0010). When only high-quality studies were included, GDT reduced only the time to tolerate oral intake (WMD -118, -203 to -033; P=0006). GDT was more effective outside enhanced recovery programmes and in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. ConclusionGDT facilitated the recovery of bowel function, particularly in patients not treated within enhanced recovery programmes and in those undergoing colorectal operations. Facilitates bowel recovery

Meta-analysis of the effect of goal-directed therapy on bowel function after abdominal surgery / Gomez-Izquierdo JC; Feldman LS; Carli F; Baldini G. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0007-1323. - 102:(2015), pp. 577-589. [10.1002/bjs.9747]

Meta-analysis of the effect of goal-directed therapy on bowel function after abdominal surgery

Baldini G
2015

Abstract

BackgroundIntraoperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) was introduced to titrate intravenous fluids, with or without inotropic drugs, based on objective measures of hypovolaemia and cardiac output measurements to improve organ perfusion. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of GDT on the recovery of bowel function after abdominal surgery. MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases were searched for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies, from January 1989 to June 2013, that compared patients who did, or did not, receive intraoperative GDT, and reported outcomes on the recovery of bowel function. Time to first flatus and first bowel motion, time to tolerate oral diet, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and primary postoperative ileus were included. ResultsThirteen trials with 1399 patients were included in the analysis. GDT shortened the time to the first bowel motion (weighted mean difference (WMD -067, 95 per cent c.i. -123 to -011; P=0020) and time to tolerate oral intake (WMD -095, -181 to -010; P=0030), and reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk difference -015, -026 to -003; P=0010). When only high-quality studies were included, GDT reduced only the time to tolerate oral intake (WMD -118, -203 to -033; P=0006). GDT was more effective outside enhanced recovery programmes and in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. ConclusionGDT facilitated the recovery of bowel function, particularly in patients not treated within enhanced recovery programmes and in those undergoing colorectal operations. Facilitates bowel recovery
2015
102
577
589
Gomez-Izquierdo JC; Feldman LS; Carli F; Baldini G
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gomez-Izquierdo-2015-Meta-analysis of the effe.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Dimensione 286.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.88 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1288204
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact