Background and Objective: Laparoscopy, thoracic epidural analgesia, and enhanced recovery program (ERP) have been shown to be the major elements to facilitate the postoperative recovery strategy in open colorectal surgery. This study compared the effect of intraoperative and postoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion with thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative restoration of bowel function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA group) or IV lidocaine infusion (IL group) (1 mg/kg per hour) with patient-controlled analgesia morphine for the first 48 hours after surgery. All patients received a similar ERP. The primary outcome was time to return of bowel function. Postoperative pain intensity, time out of bed, dietary intake, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: Mean times and SD (95% confidence interval) to first flatus (TEA, 24 [SD, 11] [19Y29] hrs vs IL, 27 [SD, 12] [22-32] hrs) and to bowel movements (TEA, 44 +/- 19 [35-52] hrs vs IL, 43 [SD, 20] [34-51] hrs) were similar in both groups (P = 0.887). Thoracic epidural analgesia provided better analgesia in patients undergoing rectal surgery. Time out of bed and dietary intake were similar. Patients in the TEA and IL groups were discharged on median day 3 (interquartile range, 3-4 days), P = 0.744. Sixty percent of patients in both groups left the hospital on day 3. Conclusions: Intraoperative and postoperative IV infusion of lidocaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP had a similar impact on bowel function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia.

Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia A Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Using an Enhanced Recovery Program / Wongyingsinn M; Baldini G; Charlebois P; Liberman S; Stein B; Carli F. - In: REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE. - ISSN 1098-7339. - 36:(2011), pp. 241-248. [10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362]

Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia A Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Using an Enhanced Recovery Program

Baldini G;
2011

Abstract

Background and Objective: Laparoscopy, thoracic epidural analgesia, and enhanced recovery program (ERP) have been shown to be the major elements to facilitate the postoperative recovery strategy in open colorectal surgery. This study compared the effect of intraoperative and postoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion with thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative restoration of bowel function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA group) or IV lidocaine infusion (IL group) (1 mg/kg per hour) with patient-controlled analgesia morphine for the first 48 hours after surgery. All patients received a similar ERP. The primary outcome was time to return of bowel function. Postoperative pain intensity, time out of bed, dietary intake, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: Mean times and SD (95% confidence interval) to first flatus (TEA, 24 [SD, 11] [19Y29] hrs vs IL, 27 [SD, 12] [22-32] hrs) and to bowel movements (TEA, 44 +/- 19 [35-52] hrs vs IL, 43 [SD, 20] [34-51] hrs) were similar in both groups (P = 0.887). Thoracic epidural analgesia provided better analgesia in patients undergoing rectal surgery. Time out of bed and dietary intake were similar. Patients in the TEA and IL groups were discharged on median day 3 (interquartile range, 3-4 days), P = 0.744. Sixty percent of patients in both groups left the hospital on day 3. Conclusions: Intraoperative and postoperative IV infusion of lidocaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP had a similar impact on bowel function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia.
2011
36
241
248
Wongyingsinn M; Baldini G; Charlebois P; Liberman S; Stein B; Carli F
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Wongyingsinn-2011-Intravenous lidocaine versus.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Dimensione 302.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
302.85 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1288216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 97
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 86
social impact