Despite minimally invasive techniques having gained wider application in cardiac surgery, current evidence on minithoracic aortic surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare early and midterm outcomes of patients undergoing operations of the proximal thoracic aorta through ministernotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS).
Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional thoracic aortic operations: Early and midterm results in a series of 624 patients / Berretta, Paolo; Chiuselli, Giulia; Galeazzi, Michele; Codecasa, Riccardo; Alfonsi, Jacopo; Braconi, Lucio; Bifulco, Olimpia; Rapisarda, Fabio; Malvindi, Pietro Giorgio; Bonacchi, Massimo; Stefano, Pierluigi; Di Eusanio, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY. - ISSN 0886-0440. - STAMPA. - (2022), pp. 1-8. [10.1111/jocs.17142]
Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional thoracic aortic operations: Early and midterm results in a series of 624 patients
Chiuselli, Giulia;Galeazzi, Michele;Codecasa, Riccardo;Bonacchi, Massimo
;Stefano, Pierluigi;
2022
Abstract
Despite minimally invasive techniques having gained wider application in cardiac surgery, current evidence on minithoracic aortic surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare early and midterm outcomes of patients undergoing operations of the proximal thoracic aorta through ministernotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS).
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Journal of Cardiac Surgery - 2022 - Berretta - Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional thoracic aortic.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
922.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
922.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
