For several decades, the boards of directors have been relatively homogeneous groups consisting of white old men (the so-called ‘good-old boys’). This static and apparently immutable feature has been changed recently, as social movements and the evolution of corporate law and good governance codes promoted an increasing diversity in the boardroom. In parallel with the diffusion of more diverse boards, leadership and governance scholars have started to analyze the consequences of board diversity. Based on the idea that members’ diversity increases group experiences and viewpoints, most scholars argued that higher board diversity positively affects board decisions and firm outcomes. However, despite the soundness of this perspective and the number of previous studies, the empirical evidence provides only partial, mixed and inconclusive findings. Building on these premises, we did a systematic and interdisciplinary literature review aimed at taking stock of our understanding of board diversity’s antecedents and consequences. Our analysis and critical assessment of 184 studies synthesizes major results, identifies main gaps, and highlights important avenues for further research. Finally, we outline several ways to overcome current (theoretical and methodological) barriers and further advance research on board diversity.

Board diversity’s antecedents and consequences: A review and research agenda / Zattoni, A., Leventis, S., Van Ees, H., De Masi, S.,. - In: THE LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY. - ISSN 1048-9843. - ELETTRONICO. - 34:(2023), pp. 1.1-1.14. [10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101659]

Board diversity’s antecedents and consequences: A review and research agenda

De Masi
2023

Abstract

For several decades, the boards of directors have been relatively homogeneous groups consisting of white old men (the so-called ‘good-old boys’). This static and apparently immutable feature has been changed recently, as social movements and the evolution of corporate law and good governance codes promoted an increasing diversity in the boardroom. In parallel with the diffusion of more diverse boards, leadership and governance scholars have started to analyze the consequences of board diversity. Based on the idea that members’ diversity increases group experiences and viewpoints, most scholars argued that higher board diversity positively affects board decisions and firm outcomes. However, despite the soundness of this perspective and the number of previous studies, the empirical evidence provides only partial, mixed and inconclusive findings. Building on these premises, we did a systematic and interdisciplinary literature review aimed at taking stock of our understanding of board diversity’s antecedents and consequences. Our analysis and critical assessment of 184 studies synthesizes major results, identifies main gaps, and highlights important avenues for further research. Finally, we outline several ways to overcome current (theoretical and methodological) barriers and further advance research on board diversity.
2023
34
1
14
Zattoni, A., Leventis, S., Van Ees, H., De Masi, S.,
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Board diversity’s antecedents and consequences- A review and research agenda.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 735.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
735.79 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1298499
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact