Conventional criteria for liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are single HCC ≤ 5 cm or less than or equal to three HCCs ≤ 3 cm. We prospectively evaluated the possibility of slightly extending these criteria in a down-staging protocol, which included patients initially outside conventional criteria: single HCC 5-6 cm or two HCCs ≤ 5 cm or less than six HCCs ≤ 4 cm and sum diameter ≤ 12 cm, but within Milan criteria in the active tumors after the down-staging procedures. The outcome of patients down-staged was compared to that of Milan criteria after liver transplantation and since the first evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. From 2003 to 2006, 177 patients with HCC were considered for transplantation: the transplantation rate was comparable between the Milan and down-staging groups: 88/129 cases (68%) versus 32/48 cases (67%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after transplantation, the 1 and 3 years' disease-free survival rates were comparable: 80% and 71% in the Milan group versus 78% and 71% in the down-staging. The actuarial intention-to-treat survival was 27/48 patients (56.3%) in the down-staging and 81/129 cases (62.8%) in the Milan group, p = n.s. The proposed down-staging criteria provide a comparable outcome to the conventional criteria. © 2008 The Authors.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: results of down-staging in patients initially outside the Milan selection criteria / RAVAIOLI, MATTEO; GRAZI, GIAN LUCA; PISCAGLIA, FABIO; TREVISANI, FRANCO; CESCON, MATTEO; ERCOLANI, GIORGIO; VIVARELLI, MARCO; GOLFIERI, RITA; D'ERRICO, ANTONIETTA; PANZINI, ILARIA; Morelli C; BERNARDI, MAURO; BOLONDI, LUIGI; PINNA, ANTONIO DANIELE. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1600-6135. - STAMPA. - 8:(2008), pp. 2547-2557. [10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02409.x]

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: results of down-staging in patients initially outside the Milan selection criteria

GRAZI, GIAN LUCA;
2008

Abstract

Conventional criteria for liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are single HCC ≤ 5 cm or less than or equal to three HCCs ≤ 3 cm. We prospectively evaluated the possibility of slightly extending these criteria in a down-staging protocol, which included patients initially outside conventional criteria: single HCC 5-6 cm or two HCCs ≤ 5 cm or less than six HCCs ≤ 4 cm and sum diameter ≤ 12 cm, but within Milan criteria in the active tumors after the down-staging procedures. The outcome of patients down-staged was compared to that of Milan criteria after liver transplantation and since the first evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. From 2003 to 2006, 177 patients with HCC were considered for transplantation: the transplantation rate was comparable between the Milan and down-staging groups: 88/129 cases (68%) versus 32/48 cases (67%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after transplantation, the 1 and 3 years' disease-free survival rates were comparable: 80% and 71% in the Milan group versus 78% and 71% in the down-staging. The actuarial intention-to-treat survival was 27/48 patients (56.3%) in the down-staging and 81/129 cases (62.8%) in the Milan group, p = n.s. The proposed down-staging criteria provide a comparable outcome to the conventional criteria. © 2008 The Authors.
2008
8
2547
2557
RAVAIOLI, MATTEO; GRAZI, GIAN LUCA; PISCAGLIA, FABIO; TREVISANI, FRANCO; CESCON, MATTEO; ERCOLANI, GIORGIO; VIVARELLI, MARCO; GOLFIERI, RITA; D'ERRICO...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2008 (Am J Transpl) Ravaioli - downstaging.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Dimensione 462.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
462.42 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1301267
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 329
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 298
social impact