Vaccination programs increasingly have to comply with standards of evidence-based decision making. However, such a framework tends to ignore social and ethical sensitivities, risking policy choices that lack crucial public support. Research is needed under which circumstances and to which extent equity and autonomy should prevail over effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in matters of infectious disease prevention. We report on a study investigating public preferences over various vaccination policy options, based on a population survey held in Flanders, Belgium (N = 1049) between March and July 2011. We found (1) that public support varied considerably between policies that were equally efficient in preventing disease but differed according to target group or incentives to improve uptake and (2) that preferences over the use of legal compulsion, financial accountability or the offering of rewards appear to be driven by individuals' social orientation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Public preferences over efficiency, equity and autonomy in vaccination policy: an empirical study / Luyten, Jeroen; Dorgali, Veronica; Hens, Niel; Beutels, Philippe. - In: SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE. - ISSN 0277-9536. - ELETTRONICO. - 77:(2013), pp. 84-89. [10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.009]

Public preferences over efficiency, equity and autonomy in vaccination policy: an empirical study

Dorgali, Veronica;
2013

Abstract

Vaccination programs increasingly have to comply with standards of evidence-based decision making. However, such a framework tends to ignore social and ethical sensitivities, risking policy choices that lack crucial public support. Research is needed under which circumstances and to which extent equity and autonomy should prevail over effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in matters of infectious disease prevention. We report on a study investigating public preferences over various vaccination policy options, based on a population survey held in Flanders, Belgium (N = 1049) between March and July 2011. We found (1) that public support varied considerably between policies that were equally efficient in preventing disease but differed according to target group or incentives to improve uptake and (2) that preferences over the use of legal compulsion, financial accountability or the offering of rewards appear to be driven by individuals' social orientation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2013
77
84
89
Luyten, Jeroen; Dorgali, Veronica; Hens, Niel; Beutels, Philippe
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pubb1_Dorgali_MV.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.18 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1308388
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact