This article discusses the etymology and meaning of the mysterious hapax legomenon pataracina in Petron. 41, 10 ; it also rejects by means of new arguments H. Fuchs’ hypothesis (accepted by K. Müller and other Petronian scholars) that the phrase coepimus inuitare conuiuarum sermones in the previous paragraph is corrupt. Moreover, it points to unnoticed echoes of Cicero and Alcaeus in Petron. 41, 9-10.
Pataracina (Petron. 41, 10) / Giovanni Zago. - In: MATERIALI E DISCUSSIONI PER L'ANALISI DEI TESTI CLASSICI. - ISSN 1724-1693. - STAMPA. - 90:(2023), pp. 189-202.
Pataracina (Petron. 41, 10)
Giovanni Zago
2023
Abstract
This article discusses the etymology and meaning of the mysterious hapax legomenon pataracina in Petron. 41, 10 ; it also rejects by means of new arguments H. Fuchs’ hypothesis (accepted by K. Müller and other Petronian scholars) that the phrase coepimus inuitare conuiuarum sermones in the previous paragraph is corrupt. Moreover, it points to unnoticed echoes of Cicero and Alcaeus in Petron. 41, 9-10.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.