Background: Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Cefiderocol susceptibility testing is complex because iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of Bruker's UMIC (R) Cefiderocol and corresponding iron-depleted CAMHB to determine MIC by broth microdilution (BMD) for clinically relevant GNB.Methods: MICs of cefiderocol for 283 GN clinical isolates were determined by BMD using iron-depleted CAMHB. Frozen panels were used as a reference. The concentration range of cefiderocol was 0.03-32 mg/L. The isolates, with different degrees of susceptibility to cefiderocol, included Enterobacterales (n = 180), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 49), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 44) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 10).Results: The rates of categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and bias were calculated to evaluate the performance of the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol, as compared with the reference method. Overall, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 90.8% EA (95% CI: 86.9%-93.7%) with a bias of -14.5% and a CA of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.1%-93.1%). For Enterobacterales, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 91.7% EA (95% CI: 86.7%-94.9%) with a bias of -25.0% and a CA of 87.8% (95% CI: 82.2%-91.8%). For non-fermenters, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 89.3% EA (95% CI: 81.9%-93.9%) (not significantly different from 90.0%, Student t-test) with a bias of -3.9% and a CA of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.3%).Conclusions: UMIC (R) Cefiderocol is a valid method for the determination of cefiderocol MICs even if higher than expected discrepancies were observed with NDM-producing Enterobacterales, which presented in most cases MIC values close to the breakpoint.

Performance evaluation of the UMIC® Cefiderocol to determine MIC in Gram-negative bacteria / Dortet, Laurent; Niccolai, Claudia; Pfennigwerth, Niels; Frisch, Stefanie; Gonzalez, Camille; Antonelli, Alberto; Giani, Tommaso; Hoenings, Robert; Gatermann, Soeren; Rossolini, Gian Maria; Naas, Thierry. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 1460-2091. - ELETTRONICO. - 78:(2023), pp. 1672-1676. [10.1093/jac/dkad149]

Performance evaluation of the UMIC® Cefiderocol to determine MIC in Gram-negative bacteria

Niccolai, Claudia;Antonelli, Alberto;Giani, Tommaso;Rossolini, Gian Maria;
2023

Abstract

Background: Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Cefiderocol susceptibility testing is complex because iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of Bruker's UMIC (R) Cefiderocol and corresponding iron-depleted CAMHB to determine MIC by broth microdilution (BMD) for clinically relevant GNB.Methods: MICs of cefiderocol for 283 GN clinical isolates were determined by BMD using iron-depleted CAMHB. Frozen panels were used as a reference. The concentration range of cefiderocol was 0.03-32 mg/L. The isolates, with different degrees of susceptibility to cefiderocol, included Enterobacterales (n = 180), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 49), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 44) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 10).Results: The rates of categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and bias were calculated to evaluate the performance of the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol, as compared with the reference method. Overall, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 90.8% EA (95% CI: 86.9%-93.7%) with a bias of -14.5% and a CA of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.1%-93.1%). For Enterobacterales, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 91.7% EA (95% CI: 86.7%-94.9%) with a bias of -25.0% and a CA of 87.8% (95% CI: 82.2%-91.8%). For non-fermenters, the UMIC (R) Cefiderocol showed 89.3% EA (95% CI: 81.9%-93.9%) (not significantly different from 90.0%, Student t-test) with a bias of -3.9% and a CA of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.3%).Conclusions: UMIC (R) Cefiderocol is a valid method for the determination of cefiderocol MICs even if higher than expected discrepancies were observed with NDM-producing Enterobacterales, which presented in most cases MIC values close to the breakpoint.
2023
78
1672
1676
Dortet, Laurent; Niccolai, Claudia; Pfennigwerth, Niels; Frisch, Stefanie; Gonzalez, Camille; Antonelli, Alberto; Giani, Tommaso; Hoenings, Robert; Ga...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
dkad149.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 361.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
361.66 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1324014
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact