Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis-stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient's consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment (LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis-stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called "life themes," which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and "semi-adaptive plans," which are the rigid management strategies of "life themes" implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis-stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.

Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure / Sassaroli Sandra, Caselli Gabriele, Mansueto Giovanni, Palmieri Sara, Pepe Alessandro, Veronese Guido, Ruggiero Giovanni Maria.. - In: JOURNAL OF RATIONAL-EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY. - ISSN 0894-9085. - ELETTRONICO. - 40:(2022), pp. 527-565. [10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3]

Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure

Mansueto Giovanni;
2022

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis-stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient's consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment (LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis-stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called "life themes," which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and "semi-adaptive plans," which are the rigid management strategies of "life themes" implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis-stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.
2022
40
527
565
Sassaroli Sandra, Caselli Gabriele, Mansueto Giovanni, Palmieri Sara, Pepe Alessandro, Veronese Guido, Ruggiero Giovanni Maria.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sassaroli et al 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.46 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1327791
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact