The article critically examines the difference between Artificial Intelligence and human intelligence, specifically the distinction between simulation and embodiment, while analyzing the issue of human embodiment in its technically and digitally augmented dimension. The idea that digital processes do not simply imply a detachment from the body, dematerialization, or disembodiment is supported by many scholars, starting from those who, as early as the 1980s, reacted to cyberpunk narratives and their tendency to introduce a new mind-body dualism. However, the article aims to frame this thesis not so much within the discourse on the post-human but within a phenomenological perspective, employing specific conceptual tools. In particular, it considers: 1) the distinction proposed by Katherine Hayles between practices of embodiment and practices of inscription; 2) the notion of structural coupling by Maturana and Varela; 3) algorithmic thought and its temporal structure.
Embodiment e pensiero algoritmico: una prospettiva fenomenologica sul rapporto tra mondo della vita e Intelligenza Artificiale / Federica Buongiorno. - In: BOLLETTINO FILOSOFICO. - ISSN 1593-7178. - ELETTRONICO. - 38:(2023), pp. 170-179.
Embodiment e pensiero algoritmico: una prospettiva fenomenologica sul rapporto tra mondo della vita e Intelligenza Artificiale
Federica Buongiorno
2023
Abstract
The article critically examines the difference between Artificial Intelligence and human intelligence, specifically the distinction between simulation and embodiment, while analyzing the issue of human embodiment in its technically and digitally augmented dimension. The idea that digital processes do not simply imply a detachment from the body, dematerialization, or disembodiment is supported by many scholars, starting from those who, as early as the 1980s, reacted to cyberpunk narratives and their tendency to introduce a new mind-body dualism. However, the article aims to frame this thesis not so much within the discourse on the post-human but within a phenomenological perspective, employing specific conceptual tools. In particular, it considers: 1) the distinction proposed by Katherine Hayles between practices of embodiment and practices of inscription; 2) the notion of structural coupling by Maturana and Varela; 3) algorithmic thought and its temporal structure.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bollettino.Filosofico2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
392.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
392.16 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.