BackgroundIron is an essential micronutrient with differing intake patterns and metabolism between men and women. Epidemiologic evidence on the association of dietary iron and its heme and non-heme components with colorectal cancer (CRC) development is inconclusive.MethodsWe examined baseline dietary questionnaire-assessed intakes of total, heme, and non-heme iron and CRC risk in the EPIC cohort. Sex-specific multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox regression. We modelled substitution of a 1 mg/day of heme iron intake with non-heme iron using the leave one-out method.ResultsOf 450,105 participants (318,680 women) followed for 14.2 +/- 4.0 years, 6162 (3511 women) developed CRC. In men, total iron intake was not associated with CRC risk (highest vs. lowest quintile, HRQ5vs.Q1:0.88; 95%CI:0.73, 1.06). An inverse association was observed for non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.80, 95%CI:0.67, 0.96) whereas heme iron showed a non-significant association (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.10; 95%CI:0.96, 1.27). In women, CRC risk was not associated with intakes of total (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.11, 95%CI:0.94, 1.31), heme (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.95; 95%CI:0.84, 1.07) or non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.03, 95%CI:0.88, 1.20). Substitution of heme with non-heme iron demonstrated lower CRC risk in men (HR:0.94; 95%CI: 0.89, 0.99).ConclusionsOur findings suggest potential sex-specific CRC risk associations for higher iron consumption that may differ by dietary sources.

Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study / Aglago, E.K., Cross, A.J., Riboli, E., Fedirko, V., Hughes, D.J., Fournier, A., Jakszyn, P., Freisling, H., Gunter, M.J., Dahm, C.C., Overvad, K., Tjønneland, A., Kyrø, C., Boutron-Ruault, M., Rothwell, J.A., Severi, G., Katzke, V., Srour, B., Schulze, M.B., Wittenbecher, C., et al.. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 1532-1827. - STAMPA. - 128:(2023), pp. 1529-1540. [10.1038/s41416-023-02164-7]

Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study

Severi, Gianluca;
2023

Abstract

BackgroundIron is an essential micronutrient with differing intake patterns and metabolism between men and women. Epidemiologic evidence on the association of dietary iron and its heme and non-heme components with colorectal cancer (CRC) development is inconclusive.MethodsWe examined baseline dietary questionnaire-assessed intakes of total, heme, and non-heme iron and CRC risk in the EPIC cohort. Sex-specific multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox regression. We modelled substitution of a 1 mg/day of heme iron intake with non-heme iron using the leave one-out method.ResultsOf 450,105 participants (318,680 women) followed for 14.2 +/- 4.0 years, 6162 (3511 women) developed CRC. In men, total iron intake was not associated with CRC risk (highest vs. lowest quintile, HRQ5vs.Q1:0.88; 95%CI:0.73, 1.06). An inverse association was observed for non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.80, 95%CI:0.67, 0.96) whereas heme iron showed a non-significant association (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.10; 95%CI:0.96, 1.27). In women, CRC risk was not associated with intakes of total (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.11, 95%CI:0.94, 1.31), heme (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.95; 95%CI:0.84, 1.07) or non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.03, 95%CI:0.88, 1.20). Substitution of heme with non-heme iron demonstrated lower CRC risk in men (HR:0.94; 95%CI: 0.89, 0.99).ConclusionsOur findings suggest potential sex-specific CRC risk associations for higher iron consumption that may differ by dietary sources.
2023
128
1529
1540
Aglago, Elom K; Cross, Amanda J; Riboli, Elio; Fedirko, Veronika; Hughes, David J; Fournier, Agnes; Jakszyn, Paula; Freisling, Heinz; Gunter, Marc J; ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1343340
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact