The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Physical Layer Authentication (PLA) in securing IoT nodes. Specifically, we present a PLA framework based on wireless fingerprinting, where the legitimated node is distinguished from potential attackers by exploiting the unique wireless channel features. To achieve this objective, we employ various machine learning approaches for anomaly detection, making use of a wide range of channel attributes in time-varying conditions. In particular, four different Machine Learning (ML) strategies in their one class version have been considered and compared: decision-tree, kernelbased, clustering and nearest neighbors. Our study highlights advantages and disadvantages of each method, considering parameters optimization, training requirements and time complexity. Results show that the use of multiple-attribute allows to achieve accurate detection performance. In particular, our results reveal that the kernel-based solution is the one that achieves best results in terms of accuracy, but the nearest neighbor’s solution has very similar performance with a significant advantage in terms of complexity and no need for training, making it more suitable for time-varying contexts, and a promising choice for securing IoT nodes through PLA based on wireless fingerprinting. The other two alternatives have somewhat lower performance but low complexity. This research contributes valuable insights into enhancing IoT security through PLA techniques.

Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches Based on Multiple Channel Attributes for Authentication and Spoofing Detection at the Physical Layer / Stomaci, Andrea; Marabissi, Dania; Mucchi, Lorenzo. - In: JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 1796-2021. - ELETTRONICO. - 19:(2024), pp. 2.99-2.106. [10.12720/jcm.19.2.99-106]

Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches Based on Multiple Channel Attributes for Authentication and Spoofing Detection at the Physical Layer

Stomaci, Andrea;Marabissi, Dania;Mucchi, Lorenzo
2024

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Physical Layer Authentication (PLA) in securing IoT nodes. Specifically, we present a PLA framework based on wireless fingerprinting, where the legitimated node is distinguished from potential attackers by exploiting the unique wireless channel features. To achieve this objective, we employ various machine learning approaches for anomaly detection, making use of a wide range of channel attributes in time-varying conditions. In particular, four different Machine Learning (ML) strategies in their one class version have been considered and compared: decision-tree, kernelbased, clustering and nearest neighbors. Our study highlights advantages and disadvantages of each method, considering parameters optimization, training requirements and time complexity. Results show that the use of multiple-attribute allows to achieve accurate detection performance. In particular, our results reveal that the kernel-based solution is the one that achieves best results in terms of accuracy, but the nearest neighbor’s solution has very similar performance with a significant advantage in terms of complexity and no need for training, making it more suitable for time-varying contexts, and a promising choice for securing IoT nodes through PLA based on wireless fingerprinting. The other two alternatives have somewhat lower performance but low complexity. This research contributes valuable insights into enhancing IoT security through PLA techniques.
2024
19
99
106
Stomaci, Andrea; Marabissi, Dania; Mucchi, Lorenzo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JCM-V19N2-99.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.75 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.75 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1351671
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact