In precision viticulture, the intra-field spatial variability characterization is a crucial step to efficiently use natural resources by lowering the environmental impact. In recent years, technologies such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Mobile Laser Scanners (MLS), multispectral sensors, Mobile Apps (MA) and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques enabled the possibility to characterize this variability with low efforts. The study aims to evaluate, compare and cross-validate the potentiality and the limits of several tools (UAV, MA, MLS) to assess the vine canopy size parameters (thickness, height, volume) by processing 3D point clouds. Three trials were carried out to test the different tools in a vineyard located in the Chianti Classico area (Tuscany, Italy). Each test was made of a UAV flight, an MLS scanning over the vineyard and a MA acquisition over 48 geo-referenced vines. The Leaf Area Index (LAI) were also assessed and taken as reference value. The results showed that the analyzed tools were able to correctly discriminate between zones with different canopy size characteristics. In particular, the R-2 between the canopy volumes acquired with the different tools was higher than 0.7, being the highest value of R-2 = 0.78 with a RMSE = 0.057 m(3) for the UAV vs. MLS comparison. The highest correlations were found between the height data, being the highest value of R-2 = 0.86 with a RMSE = 0.105 m for the MA vs. MLS comparison. For the thickness data, the correlations were weaker, being the lowest value of R-2 = 0.48 with a RMSE = 0.052 m for the UAV vs. MLS comparison. The correlation between the LAI and the canopy volumes was moderately strong for all the tools with the highest value of R-2 = 0.74 for the LAI vs. V_MLS data and the lowest value of R-2 = 0.69 for the LAI vs. V_UAV data.

Comparison of Aerial and Ground 3D Point Clouds for Canopy Size Assessment in Precision Viticulture / Andrea Pagliai; Marco Ammoniaci; Daniele Sarri; Riccardo Lisci; Rita Perria; Marco Vieri; Mauro Eugenio Maria D???Arcangelo; Paolo Storchi; Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis. - In: REMOTE SENSING. - ISSN 2072-4292. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:(2022), pp. 1-20. [10.3390/rs14051145]

Comparison of Aerial and Ground 3D Point Clouds for Canopy Size Assessment in Precision Viticulture

Andrea Pagliai
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Marco Ammoniaci
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Daniele Sarri
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Riccardo Lisci
Data Curation
;
Rita Perria
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Marco Vieri
Supervision
;
Paolo Storchi
Supervision
;
Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2022

Abstract

In precision viticulture, the intra-field spatial variability characterization is a crucial step to efficiently use natural resources by lowering the environmental impact. In recent years, technologies such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Mobile Laser Scanners (MLS), multispectral sensors, Mobile Apps (MA) and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques enabled the possibility to characterize this variability with low efforts. The study aims to evaluate, compare and cross-validate the potentiality and the limits of several tools (UAV, MA, MLS) to assess the vine canopy size parameters (thickness, height, volume) by processing 3D point clouds. Three trials were carried out to test the different tools in a vineyard located in the Chianti Classico area (Tuscany, Italy). Each test was made of a UAV flight, an MLS scanning over the vineyard and a MA acquisition over 48 geo-referenced vines. The Leaf Area Index (LAI) were also assessed and taken as reference value. The results showed that the analyzed tools were able to correctly discriminate between zones with different canopy size characteristics. In particular, the R-2 between the canopy volumes acquired with the different tools was higher than 0.7, being the highest value of R-2 = 0.78 with a RMSE = 0.057 m(3) for the UAV vs. MLS comparison. The highest correlations were found between the height data, being the highest value of R-2 = 0.86 with a RMSE = 0.105 m for the MA vs. MLS comparison. For the thickness data, the correlations were weaker, being the lowest value of R-2 = 0.48 with a RMSE = 0.052 m for the UAV vs. MLS comparison. The correlation between the LAI and the canopy volumes was moderately strong for all the tools with the highest value of R-2 = 0.74 for the LAI vs. V_MLS data and the lowest value of R-2 = 0.69 for the LAI vs. V_UAV data.
2022
14
1
20
Andrea Pagliai; Marco Ammoniaci; Daniele Sarri; Riccardo Lisci; Rita Perria; Marco Vieri; Mauro Eugenio Maria D???Arcangelo; Paolo Storchi; Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1354240
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact