The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neo-plasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.
Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) / Stahl, Maximilian; Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp; Xie, Zhuoer; Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della; Komrokji, Rami; Xu, Mina L.; Abdel-Wahab, Omar; Taylor, Justin; Steensma, David P.; Starczynowski, Daniel T.; Sekeres, Mikkael A.; Sanz, Guillermo; Sallman, David A.; Roboz, Gail J.; Platzbecker, Uwe; Patnaik, Mrinal M.; Padron, Eric; Odenike, Olatoyosi; Nimer, Stephen D.; Nazha, Aziz; Majeti, Ravi; Loghavi, Sanam; Little, Richard F.; List, Alan F.; Kim, Tae Kon; Hourigan, Christopher S.; Hasserjian, Robert P.; Halene, Stephanie; Griffiths, Elizabeth A.; Gore, Steven D.; Greenberg, Peter; Figueroa, Maria E.; Fenaux, Pierre; Efficace, Fabio; DeZern, Amy E.; Daver, Naval G.; Churpek, Jane E.; Carraway, Hetty E.; Buckstein, Rena; Brunner, Andrew M.; Boultwood, Jacqueline; Borate, Uma; Bejar, Rafael; Bennett, John M.; Wei, Andrew H.; Santini, Valeria; Savona, Michael R.; Zeidan, Amer M.. - In: BLOOD REVIEWS. - ISSN 0268-960X. - ELETTRONICO. - 62:(2023), pp. 101128.0-101128.0. [10.1016/j.blre.2023.101128]
Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)
Santini, ValeriaMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2023
Abstract
The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neo-plasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0268960X23000899-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
9.71 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.71 MB | Adobe PDF | |
1-s2.0-S0268960X23000899-main-3.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
9.71 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.71 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.