Wastewater-based epidemiology has proved to be a suitable approach for tracking the spread of epidemic agents including SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Different protocols have been developed for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater samples, but little is known on their performance. In this study we compared three protocols based on Reverse Transcription Real Time-PCR (RT-PCR) and one based on Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection from 35 wastewater samples. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by at least one method in 85.7 % of samples, while 51.4 %, 22.8 % and 8.6 % resulted positive with two, three or all four methods, respectively. Protocols based on commercial RT-PCR assays and on Droplet Digital PCR showed an overall higher sensitivity vs. an in-house assay. The use of more than one system, targeting different genes, could be helpful to increase detection sensitivity.
Evaluation of different molecular systems for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater samples / Morecchiato, Fabio; Coppi, Marco; Niccolai, Claudia; Antonelli, Alberto; Di Gloria, Leandro; Calà, Piergiuseppe; Mancuso, Fabrizio; Ramazzotti, Matteo; Lotti, Tommaso; Lubello, Claudio; Rossolini, Gian Maria. - In: JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS. - ISSN 0166-0934. - ELETTRONICO. - 328:(2024), pp. 114956.0-114956.0. [10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.114956]
Evaluation of different molecular systems for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater samples
Morecchiato, Fabio;Coppi, Marco;Niccolai, Claudia;Antonelli, Alberto;Di Gloria, Leandro;Ramazzotti, Matteo;Lotti, Tommaso;Lubello, Claudio;Rossolini, Gian Maria
2024
Abstract
Wastewater-based epidemiology has proved to be a suitable approach for tracking the spread of epidemic agents including SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Different protocols have been developed for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater samples, but little is known on their performance. In this study we compared three protocols based on Reverse Transcription Real Time-PCR (RT-PCR) and one based on Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection from 35 wastewater samples. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by at least one method in 85.7 % of samples, while 51.4 %, 22.8 % and 8.6 % resulted positive with two, three or all four methods, respectively. Protocols based on commercial RT-PCR assays and on Droplet Digital PCR showed an overall higher sensitivity vs. an in-house assay. The use of more than one system, targeting different genes, could be helpful to increase detection sensitivity.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0166093424000806-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
639.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
639.71 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.