A small passage in Apul. Met. 11, 28 has always been considered as intact and incorrupted, but it actually hides at least one difficulty, namely in the strange use of an incidental "inquit". The problem seems to be of no great importance and so scholars generally keep trusting F’s text. But what if this inquit represented a corruption in the text? The new reading gains several advantages and it could perhaps help to solve another little problem in the syntax of the text.
Nota ad Apuleio, Met. 11, 28 / lara nicolini. - In: RIVISTA DI FILOLOGIA E DI ISTRUZIONE CLASSICA. - ISSN 0035-6220. - STAMPA. - 138, fasc. 1-2:(2010), pp. 194-197.
Nota ad Apuleio, Met. 11, 28
lara nicolini
2010
Abstract
A small passage in Apul. Met. 11, 28 has always been considered as intact and incorrupted, but it actually hides at least one difficulty, namely in the strange use of an incidental "inquit". The problem seems to be of no great importance and so scholars generally keep trusting F’s text. But what if this inquit represented a corruption in the text? The new reading gains several advantages and it could perhaps help to solve another little problem in the syntax of the text.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RFIC.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
81.43 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
81.43 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
|
Nicolini_RFIC_2010 1 (1).pdf
Accesso chiuso
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
3.51 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.51 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
