This article expounds on the findings of European-financed research concerning how different States grappled with the socioeconomic consequences of the pandemic and to what extent one can envisage non-marginal institutional and policy change towards the post-pandemic phase. The article investigates any connection between what the States are promising and the social impact of the COVID-19 crisis, appraising the general orientation of social policy reform in terms of institutional design and ‘philosophical’ inspiration. By the latter, we mean a social rights-based approach and an active social policy approach, also termed social investment. Therefore, rather than only seeing how policies impact the socioeconomic situation, we also detect how the socioeconomic situation impacts the general political response. To this end, the article analyses a set of national jurisdictions against the backdrop of a piece of supranational legislation, such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), intended to bring about essential change. The approach is interdisciplinary, involving legal and sociological analysis, and uses much reliable information to chart specific policy patterns valuable for decision-makers.

Managing Post-Pandemic Recovery. The normalisation of emergency socio-economic measures in different European [constitutional] landscapes / Stefano Civitarese Matteucci, Virginia Campigli, Alfredo Cartone, Melania D’Angelosante, Gianlorenzo Ioannides, Mara Maretti. - In: ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW. - ISSN 2239-8279. - ELETTRONICO. - (2025), pp. 47-81.

Managing Post-Pandemic Recovery. The normalisation of emergency socio-economic measures in different European [constitutional] landscapes

Stefano Civitarese Matteucci;Virginia Campigli;Melania D’Angelosante;
2025

Abstract

This article expounds on the findings of European-financed research concerning how different States grappled with the socioeconomic consequences of the pandemic and to what extent one can envisage non-marginal institutional and policy change towards the post-pandemic phase. The article investigates any connection between what the States are promising and the social impact of the COVID-19 crisis, appraising the general orientation of social policy reform in terms of institutional design and ‘philosophical’ inspiration. By the latter, we mean a social rights-based approach and an active social policy approach, also termed social investment. Therefore, rather than only seeing how policies impact the socioeconomic situation, we also detect how the socioeconomic situation impacts the general political response. To this end, the article analyses a set of national jurisdictions against the backdrop of a piece of supranational legislation, such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), intended to bring about essential change. The approach is interdisciplinary, involving legal and sociological analysis, and uses much reliable information to chart specific policy patterns valuable for decision-makers.
2025
47
81
Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
Goal 1: No poverty
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
Stefano Civitarese Matteucci, Virginia Campigli, Alfredo Cartone, Melania D’Angelosante, Gianlorenzo Ioannides, Mara Maretti
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
S. CIVITARESE, V. CAMPIGLI ET AL._Managing Post-Pandemic Recovery.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 705.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
705.29 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1414673
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact