Formestane (4-hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione, 4OH-AED) is an aromatase inhibitor prohibited in sports. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that it can also originate endogenously by the hydroxylation in C4 position of androstenedione. Thus, the use of isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is mandatory according to the World Antidoping Agency (WADA) to discriminate endogenous from synthetic origin. In a previous work and after oral administrations of formestane (4OH-AED), the ratio between the main formestane metabolite (4 alpha-hydroxyepiandrosterone; 4OH-EA) and formestane parent compound could help to identify the endogenous origin, avoiding unnecessary and costly IRMS confirmations. In the present work, we investigated whether the same criteria could also be applied after transdermal applications. Six volunteers were transdermally treated once with formestane. Urine samples were collected for 120 h postadministration and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS and GC-MS/MS). Formestane and its major metabolites were monitored. The kinetic profile of formestane and its main metabolites was found different between oral and transdermal application. A shift on the excretion of the metabolites compared to formestane itself that can be observed after the oral administration, is absent after the transdermal one. This makes that a simple criteria cannot be applied to differentiate the endogenous from the synthetic origin based on metabolic ratios. The ratio between 4-hydroxyepiandrosterone and 4-hydroxyandrosterone (4OH-A) can be used to differentiate the route of administration. Ratios higher than one (4OH-EA/4OH-A > 1) are diagnostic of an oral administration. This allows to correctly interpret the 4OH-EA/4OH-AED ratio as proposed in our previous investigation. The results of this work demonstrate that the use of appropriate biomarkers (metabolic ratios) helps to reach correct conclusions without using complex and costly instrumentation approaches.

Metabolism of formestane in humans: Identification of urinary biomarkers for antidoping analysis / de la Torre X; Brito DM; Colamonici C; Parr MK; BOTRE' F. - In: STEROIDS. - ISSN 0039-128X. - 146:(2019), pp. 34-42. [10.1016/j.steroids.2019.03.005]

Metabolism of formestane in humans: Identification of urinary biomarkers for antidoping analysis

BOTRE' F
2019

Abstract

Formestane (4-hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione, 4OH-AED) is an aromatase inhibitor prohibited in sports. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that it can also originate endogenously by the hydroxylation in C4 position of androstenedione. Thus, the use of isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is mandatory according to the World Antidoping Agency (WADA) to discriminate endogenous from synthetic origin. In a previous work and after oral administrations of formestane (4OH-AED), the ratio between the main formestane metabolite (4 alpha-hydroxyepiandrosterone; 4OH-EA) and formestane parent compound could help to identify the endogenous origin, avoiding unnecessary and costly IRMS confirmations. In the present work, we investigated whether the same criteria could also be applied after transdermal applications. Six volunteers were transdermally treated once with formestane. Urine samples were collected for 120 h postadministration and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS and GC-MS/MS). Formestane and its major metabolites were monitored. The kinetic profile of formestane and its main metabolites was found different between oral and transdermal application. A shift on the excretion of the metabolites compared to formestane itself that can be observed after the oral administration, is absent after the transdermal one. This makes that a simple criteria cannot be applied to differentiate the endogenous from the synthetic origin based on metabolic ratios. The ratio between 4-hydroxyepiandrosterone and 4-hydroxyandrosterone (4OH-A) can be used to differentiate the route of administration. Ratios higher than one (4OH-EA/4OH-A > 1) are diagnostic of an oral administration. This allows to correctly interpret the 4OH-EA/4OH-AED ratio as proposed in our previous investigation. The results of this work demonstrate that the use of appropriate biomarkers (metabolic ratios) helps to reach correct conclusions without using complex and costly instrumentation approaches.
2019
146
34
42
de la Torre X; Brito DM; Colamonici C; Parr MK; BOTRE' F
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
82 Metabolism 2019.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 988.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
988.04 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1418641
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact