Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of ‘‘threat’’ related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelli- gence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self- confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.

Social class is dead, long live social class! Stereotype threat among low-socioeconomic individuals / Spencer B; Castano E. - In: SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH. - ISSN 0885-7466. - STAMPA. - 20:(2007), pp. 418-432. [10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7]

Social class is dead, long live social class! Stereotype threat among low-socioeconomic individuals

Castano E
2007

Abstract

Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of ‘‘threat’’ related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelli- gence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self- confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.
2007
20
418
432
Spencer B; Castano E
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2007SpencerCastano_SJR.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 132.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
132.44 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1419107
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 151
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact