Building on magical contagion literature, we show that the way in which money is acquired colors the perception of the money itself, and thus affect the way it is spent. In a hypothetical scenario participants who imagined acquiring money immorally (versus morally) experienced more guilt about the way in which they acquired it and spent less of it. Furthermore, in the immoral, but not the moral condition, guilt correlated significantly with spending: the greater the guilt, the less money was spent. We interpret this finding as stemming from individuals’ desire not to handle what they see as “dirty” money.
Money doesn't Stink. or does it? The effect of immorally acquiring money on its spending / Kardos P; Castano E. - In: CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1046-1310. - STAMPA. - 31:(2012), pp. 381-385. [10.1007/s12144-012-9154-1]
Money doesn't Stink. or does it? The effect of immorally acquiring money on its spending
Castano E
2012
Abstract
Building on magical contagion literature, we show that the way in which money is acquired colors the perception of the money itself, and thus affect the way it is spent. In a hypothetical scenario participants who imagined acquiring money immorally (versus morally) experienced more guilt about the way in which they acquired it and spent less of it. Furthermore, in the immoral, but not the moral condition, guilt correlated significantly with spending: the greater the guilt, the less money was spent. We interpret this finding as stemming from individuals’ desire not to handle what they see as “dirty” money.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2012KardosCastano_CP.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
123.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
123.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.