The development of generative artificial intelligence for human motion generation has expanded rapidly, necessitating a unified evaluation framework. This paper presents a detailed review of eight evaluation metrics for human motion generation, highlighting their unique features and shortcomings. We propose standardized practices through a unified evaluation setup to facilitate consistent model comparisons. Additionally, we introduce a novel metric that assesses diversity in temporal distortion by analyzing warping diversity, thereby enhancing the evaluation of temporal data. We also conduct experimental analyses of three generative models using two publicly available datasets, offering insights into the interpretation of each metric in specific case scenarios. Our goal is to offer a clear, user-friendly evaluation framework for newcomers, complemented by publicly accessible code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG.

Establishing a unified evaluation framework for human motion generation: A comparative analysis of metrics / Ismail-Fawaz, Ali; Devanne, Maxime; Berretti, Stefano; Weber, Jonathan; Forestier, Germain. - In: COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING. - ISSN 1077-3142. - STAMPA. - 254:(2025), pp. 104337.1-104337.20. [10.1016/j.cviu.2025.104337]

Establishing a unified evaluation framework for human motion generation: A comparative analysis of metrics

Devanne, Maxime;Berretti, Stefano;
2025

Abstract

The development of generative artificial intelligence for human motion generation has expanded rapidly, necessitating a unified evaluation framework. This paper presents a detailed review of eight evaluation metrics for human motion generation, highlighting their unique features and shortcomings. We propose standardized practices through a unified evaluation setup to facilitate consistent model comparisons. Additionally, we introduce a novel metric that assesses diversity in temporal distortion by analyzing warping diversity, thereby enhancing the evaluation of temporal data. We also conduct experimental analyses of three generative models using two publicly available datasets, offering insights into the interpretation of each metric in specific case scenarios. Our goal is to offer a clear, user-friendly evaluation framework for newcomers, complemented by publicly accessible code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG.
2025
254
1
20
Ismail-Fawaz, Ali; Devanne, Maxime; Berretti, Stefano; Weber, Jonathan; Forestier, Germain
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cviu2025.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.83 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1423701
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact