: This study compared individuals with Restrictive Anorexia Nervosa (R-AN; n = 40), Healthy Controls (HCs; n = 45), and individuals at risk for eating disorders (RI; n = 38) using a Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm. Participants completed a Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) task involving food-related and neutral contexts. The study examined whether RL impairments in R-AN are context-specific and whether they reflect maintaining factors or preclinical markers. R-AN participants showed reduced learning rates in food-related contexts compared to HC and RI but performed similarly in neutral contexts. Only R-AN individuals showed within-group differences between food and neutral tasks, indicating a disorder-specific impairment. The RI group performed comparably to HCs, suggesting that RL deficits are unlikely to be risk markers. These findings highlight the context-specificity of RL deficits in R-AN, which may act as maintaining factors and could be targeted to improve cognitive flexibility and food-related decision-making.
Food-specific decision-making in anorexia nervosa: a comparative study of clinical, at-risk, and healthy control groups / Colpizzi, Ilaria; Sica, Claudio; Marchetti, Igor; Guidi, Lisa; Danti, Sara; Lucchesi, Silvia; Giusti, Elisa; Di Meglio, Martina; Ballardini, Donatella; Mazzoni, Chiara; Schumann, Romana; Pieraccioli, Caterina; Ceccarini, Francesco; Caudek, Corrado. - In: EATING DISORDERS. - ISSN 1064-0266. - STAMPA. - (2025), pp. 1-19. [10.1080/10640266.2025.2519903]
Food-specific decision-making in anorexia nervosa: a comparative study of clinical, at-risk, and healthy control groups
Colpizzi, Ilaria
;Sica, Claudio;Marchetti, Igor;Lucchesi, Silvia;Mazzoni, Chiara;Ceccarini, Francesco;Caudek, Corrado
2025
Abstract
: This study compared individuals with Restrictive Anorexia Nervosa (R-AN; n = 40), Healthy Controls (HCs; n = 45), and individuals at risk for eating disorders (RI; n = 38) using a Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm. Participants completed a Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) task involving food-related and neutral contexts. The study examined whether RL impairments in R-AN are context-specific and whether they reflect maintaining factors or preclinical markers. R-AN participants showed reduced learning rates in food-related contexts compared to HC and RI but performed similarly in neutral contexts. Only R-AN individuals showed within-group differences between food and neutral tasks, indicating a disorder-specific impairment. The RI group performed comparably to HCs, suggesting that RL deficits are unlikely to be risk markers. These findings highlight the context-specificity of RL deficits in R-AN, which may act as maintaining factors and could be targeted to improve cognitive flexibility and food-related decision-making.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.