This article examines the legal foundations, scope, and practical challenges of the emerging "Right to Explanation" (RTE) in the European Union’s regulatory framework on Artificial Intelligence (AI). It analyses the cognitive barriers inherent to Automated Decision-Making (ADM) systems — such as opacity, correlation-based logic, and bias — and assesses how the RTE can enhance transparency and fairness. The paper then offers a critical reading of Article 86 of the AI Act, highlighting both its innovative potential and its structural weaknesses, particularly concerning enforceability and accountability. It argues for a tailored, context-sensitive implementation of the RTE to ensure that it can meaningfully safeguard fundamental rights in the digital age.
The Right to Explanation: Legal Challenges and the Future of Fairness in Automated Decision-Making / Dirutigliano, J.; Baldini, D.. - In: JOURNAL OF AI LAW AND REGULATION. - ISSN 2942-4380. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:(2025), pp. 120-138. [10.21552/aire/2025/2/5]
The Right to Explanation: Legal Challenges and the Future of Fairness in Automated Decision-Making
Baldini, D.
2025
Abstract
This article examines the legal foundations, scope, and practical challenges of the emerging "Right to Explanation" (RTE) in the European Union’s regulatory framework on Artificial Intelligence (AI). It analyses the cognitive barriers inherent to Automated Decision-Making (ADM) systems — such as opacity, correlation-based logic, and bias — and assesses how the RTE can enhance transparency and fairness. The paper then offers a critical reading of Article 86 of the AI Act, highlighting both its innovative potential and its structural weaknesses, particularly concerning enforceability and accountability. It argues for a tailored, context-sensitive implementation of the RTE to ensure that it can meaningfully safeguard fundamental rights in the digital age.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



