Background: This study aimed to assess the most appropriate thresholds for albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) in patients who had a suspected periprosthetic knee infection. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed threshold was evaluated. Materials and methods: Between January 2020 and April 2022, patients with failed or painful knee arthroplasty who were admitted to a tertiary referral institution undergoing the standardized diagnostic protocol to identify those with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria were used to classify patients with PJIs and aseptic joints. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AGR were calculated to define the test’s diagnostic accuracy. Results: The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AGR was 1.43. AGR registered a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91–197%), a specificity of 63% (95% CI 56–69%), a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 69–81%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 86–94%). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.88). Although body mass index (BMI), uremia, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), international normalized ratio (INR), and alkaline phosphatase showed significant differences between the false positive cases and those cases affected by aseptic failure with AGR higher than 1.43, indicating potential confounding effects (p < 0.05), no parameter was found to be a significant predictor of false positives cases (p > 0.05). Conclusions: For its high sensitivity, AGR showed potential as a screening tool for detecting infections in PJI diagnostics. Level of evidence: III.

Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool? / De Mauro, Domenico; Ascione, Tiziana; Festa, Enrico; Marasco, Lucrezia; Leggieri, Filippo; Rosito, Sara; Innocenti, Matteo; Di Pace, Edoardo; Balato, Giovanni. - In: JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1590-9999. - ELETTRONICO. - 26:(2025), pp. 39.0-39.0. [10.1186/s10195-025-00857-8]

Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?

Marasco, Lucrezia;Leggieri, Filippo;Innocenti, Matteo;
2025

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the most appropriate thresholds for albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) in patients who had a suspected periprosthetic knee infection. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed threshold was evaluated. Materials and methods: Between January 2020 and April 2022, patients with failed or painful knee arthroplasty who were admitted to a tertiary referral institution undergoing the standardized diagnostic protocol to identify those with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria were used to classify patients with PJIs and aseptic joints. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AGR were calculated to define the test’s diagnostic accuracy. Results: The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AGR was 1.43. AGR registered a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91–197%), a specificity of 63% (95% CI 56–69%), a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 69–81%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 86–94%). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.88). Although body mass index (BMI), uremia, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), international normalized ratio (INR), and alkaline phosphatase showed significant differences between the false positive cases and those cases affected by aseptic failure with AGR higher than 1.43, indicating potential confounding effects (p < 0.05), no parameter was found to be a significant predictor of false positives cases (p > 0.05). Conclusions: For its high sensitivity, AGR showed potential as a screening tool for detecting infections in PJI diagnostics. Level of evidence: III.
2025
26
0
0
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
De Mauro, Domenico; Ascione, Tiziana; Festa, Enrico; Marasco, Lucrezia; Leggieri, Filippo; Rosito, Sara; Innocenti, Matteo; Di Pace, Edoardo; Balato, ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s10195-025-00857-8.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 978.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
978.52 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1432793
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact