The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has been a significant innovation in European Union (EU) governance and represents an opportunity to prioritize healthcare investments and reforms, among other policies. While much has been written about the EU post‐pandemic, particularly regarding the potential for changing the economic paradigm and triggering substantial domestic policy changes, the present article sheds light on the RRF through a multi‐level governance and policy design approach. The article combines the examination of the EU policy strategy at the top with the analysis of national and regional capacities and implementation programs at the bottom. By focusing on the Italian case, we shed light on the opportunities and limitations of both the RRF and the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP). The design of both the RRF and NRRP reveals weaknesses that could hinder the success of the initiative.

Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach / David Natali; Emmanuele Pavolini; Andrea Terlizzi. - In: RISK, HAZARDS & CRISIS IN PUBLIC POLICY. - ISSN 1944-4079. - ELETTRONICO. - 16:(2025), pp. 4.1-4.13. [10.1002/rhc3.70038]

Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach

Emmanuele Pavolini;Andrea Terlizzi
2025

Abstract

The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has been a significant innovation in European Union (EU) governance and represents an opportunity to prioritize healthcare investments and reforms, among other policies. While much has been written about the EU post‐pandemic, particularly regarding the potential for changing the economic paradigm and triggering substantial domestic policy changes, the present article sheds light on the RRF through a multi‐level governance and policy design approach. The article combines the examination of the EU policy strategy at the top with the analysis of national and regional capacities and implementation programs at the bottom. By focusing on the Italian case, we shed light on the opportunities and limitations of both the RRF and the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP). The design of both the RRF and NRRP reveals weaknesses that could hinder the success of the initiative.
2025
16
1
13
David Natali; Emmanuele Pavolini; Andrea Terlizzi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1438714
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact