Objectives: Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians’ perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a ‘Treat to Target’ (T2T) strategy. Methods: SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey. Results: A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy. Conclusion: Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.

Clinicians’ perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis / Campanaro, Giulia; Bandini, Giulia; Alunno, Alessia; Di Donato, Stefano; Alcacer-Pitarch, Begonya; Galetti, Ilaria; Ruaro, Barbara; Randone, Silvia Bellando; Pignone, Alberto Moggi; Matucci-Cerinic, Marco; McMahan, Zsuzsanna H; Hughes, Michael. - In: JOURNAL OF SCLERODERMA AND RELATED DISORDERS. - ISSN 2397-1983. - ELETTRONICO. - 10:(2025), pp. 434-442. [10.1177/23971983251336616]

Clinicians’ perspectives concerning treatment initiation and escalation strategies for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis

Campanaro, Giulia;Bandini, Giulia;Randone, Silvia Bellando;Pignone, Alberto Moggi;Matucci-Cerinic, Marco;
2025

Abstract

Objectives: Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and remain a major treatment challenge. Our aim was to explore clinicians’ perspectives towards treatment initiation and escalation, akin to a ‘Treat to Target’ (T2T) strategy. Methods: SSc clinicians were invited to participate in an online survey. Results: A total of 173 responses (75% rheumatologists) were obtained from 33 countries. When initiating a change in oral drug therapy for SSc-DUs, most (80%) respondents would consider adding new medication to existing treatment, and 50% would increase existing treatment dose. Time to assess the impact of treatment change varied considerably, with around half (43.6%) waiting 1 month. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and prostanoids were considered most efficacious for DU prevention, with good perceived efficacy from calcium channel blockers and moderate benefit from anti-platelet agents and immunosuppression. Side effects (e.g. headache and peripheral oedema) are perceived to be a significant issue with oral vasodilatory/vasoactive therapies in many patients. The highest rated T2T targets were (1) complete absence of new/recurrent DUs (63%), (2) reduction >50% in the number of DU recurrence (52%) and (3) reduction in DU healing time (37%) and reduction in DU pain >50% (37%). The most frequent reasons for hospitalisation were to administer intravenous treatment (91%) and DU complications (87%). Surgery is reserved for the threatened digit (e.g. gangrene), underlying calcinosis and failure of medical therapy. Conclusion: Significant heterogeneity currently exists concerning treatment initiation and escalation for SSc-DUs, potentially amenable to a T2T strategy.
2025
10
434
442
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Campanaro, Giulia; Bandini, Giulia; Alunno, Alessia; Di Donato, Stefano; Alcacer-Pitarch, Begonya; Galetti, Ilaria; Ruaro, Barbara; Randone, Silvia Be...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1439495
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact