The twentieth-century architecture has long struggled to define its boundaries and its terminology. The coexistence of expressions such as ‘Restoration of the Modern’, ‘of the Contemporary’, or ‘of the Twentieth-Century’ reveals a profound uncertainty that extends from language to disciplinary practice. Words, far from being neutral, become instruments of legitimization and shape the values attributed to architectural heritage. In the case of modern and contemporary architecture, the overlapping of categories such as modernity, memory, and identity has generated conceptual and methodological ambiguities, particularly when the recent past enters the domain of preservation. The progressive transformation of modern works from testimonies of an era into monuments of collective culture exposes tensions between historical interpretation and aesthetic reconstruction. This essay examines how linguistic shifts, theoretical debates, and heritage policies have contributed to redefining the status of twentieth-century architecture, questioning the criteria of its recognition, the role of authorship, and the meaning of restoration itself. Ultimately, the restoration of the twentieth-century emerges as a field suspended between critical interpretation and the construction of new narratives of legitimacy

Le ambiguità del Moderno. Riflessioni sul restauro e la patrimonializzazione del Novecento. The Ambiguities of the Modern. Reflections on the Restoration and Patrimonialization of Twentieth-Century Heritage / caccia gherardini susanna. - In: RESTAURO ARCHEOLOGICO. - ISSN 1724-9686. - STAMPA. - 33:(2025), pp. 10-15.

Le ambiguità del Moderno. Riflessioni sul restauro e la patrimonializzazione del Novecento. The Ambiguities of the Modern. Reflections on the Restoration and Patrimonialization of Twentieth-Century Heritage

caccia gherardini susanna
2025

Abstract

The twentieth-century architecture has long struggled to define its boundaries and its terminology. The coexistence of expressions such as ‘Restoration of the Modern’, ‘of the Contemporary’, or ‘of the Twentieth-Century’ reveals a profound uncertainty that extends from language to disciplinary practice. Words, far from being neutral, become instruments of legitimization and shape the values attributed to architectural heritage. In the case of modern and contemporary architecture, the overlapping of categories such as modernity, memory, and identity has generated conceptual and methodological ambiguities, particularly when the recent past enters the domain of preservation. The progressive transformation of modern works from testimonies of an era into monuments of collective culture exposes tensions between historical interpretation and aesthetic reconstruction. This essay examines how linguistic shifts, theoretical debates, and heritage policies have contributed to redefining the status of twentieth-century architecture, questioning the criteria of its recognition, the role of authorship, and the meaning of restoration itself. Ultimately, the restoration of the twentieth-century emerges as a field suspended between critical interpretation and the construction of new narratives of legitimacy
2025
33
10
15
caccia gherardini susanna
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Oltreil900_Full-paper_Caccia Gherardini.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 8.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.37 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1444914
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact