Case conceptualization in psychotherapy allows clinicians to hypothesize the origins of patients’ difficulties and to plan interventions. The LIBET model (Life and Themes Implication Biased: Elicitation and Treatment, Sassaroli et al., 2022) is a cognitive-behavioral framework designed to construct a case conceptualization. The present study aims to investigate differences in the dimensions assessed by the LIBET model among individuals without a diagnosis, those with symptomatic disorders, and those with comorbid personality disorders. A total of 738 participants completed a psychological assessment, which included semi-structured interviews, LIBET-Questionnaire, and self-report instruments. Findings revealed group differences in the selection of strategies used to manage psychological distress, as well as significant differences across three out of the four metacognitive axes included in the LIBET model. Metacognitive axes were found to be correlated with personality rigidity and potential predictors of psychosocial wellbeing, supporting the model’s sensitivity. The study presents limitations primarily related to participant recruitment and research design. Further studies will be required to enhance the validation of the LIBET model. Nonetheless, the LIBET-Questionnaire appears to be a promising tool for assessment purposes and for monitoring therapeutic progress. It can help identify phases of improvement or lack of progress and guide adjustments to the treatment plan within a shared therapeutic framework.

LIBET Dimensions Across Clinical Populations / Offredi, Alessia; Dalrì, Elisabetta; Barberis, Linda; Celebre, Micaela; Palmieri, Sara; Mansueto, Giovanni; Ruggiero, Giovanni Maria; Caselli, Gabriele; Sassaroli, Sandra. - In: JOURNAL OF RATIONAL-EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY. - ISSN 0894-9085. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:(2025), pp. 68.1-68.18. [10.1007/s10942-025-00634-w]

LIBET Dimensions Across Clinical Populations

Mansueto, Giovanni;
2025

Abstract

Case conceptualization in psychotherapy allows clinicians to hypothesize the origins of patients’ difficulties and to plan interventions. The LIBET model (Life and Themes Implication Biased: Elicitation and Treatment, Sassaroli et al., 2022) is a cognitive-behavioral framework designed to construct a case conceptualization. The present study aims to investigate differences in the dimensions assessed by the LIBET model among individuals without a diagnosis, those with symptomatic disorders, and those with comorbid personality disorders. A total of 738 participants completed a psychological assessment, which included semi-structured interviews, LIBET-Questionnaire, and self-report instruments. Findings revealed group differences in the selection of strategies used to manage psychological distress, as well as significant differences across three out of the four metacognitive axes included in the LIBET model. Metacognitive axes were found to be correlated with personality rigidity and potential predictors of psychosocial wellbeing, supporting the model’s sensitivity. The study presents limitations primarily related to participant recruitment and research design. Further studies will be required to enhance the validation of the LIBET model. Nonetheless, the LIBET-Questionnaire appears to be a promising tool for assessment purposes and for monitoring therapeutic progress. It can help identify phases of improvement or lack of progress and guide adjustments to the treatment plan within a shared therapeutic framework.
2025
43
1
18
Offredi, Alessia; Dalrì, Elisabetta; Barberis, Linda; Celebre, Micaela; Palmieri, Sara; Mansueto, Giovanni; Ruggiero, Giovanni Maria; Caselli, Gabriel...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Offredi et al 2025.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1447516
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact