Introduction: Surgery for resectable gallbladder cancer (GbC) encompasses complex operative management, and evaluating surgical quality through textbook outcome (TO) is crucial. This study aimed to assess TO incidence and impact in a global cohort, identify independent predictors, and evaluate TO rates of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, including robotic (ROB) and laparoscopic (LPS). Materials and methods: This cohort study included patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy for GbC (T1b–T3) from 2012 to 2023 in 41 hospitals. TO was defined as the absence of intraoperative transfusion, major complications, readmission, reoperation, or 90-day mortality, alongside negative margins and ≥6 retrieved lymph nodes. MI-TO additionally required no conversion. A 1:1 propensity score matching compared TO in open (OPEN) and MI approaches. Data were analyzed from July to November 2024. Results: Among 667 patients (MI, 361; OPEN, 306), TO was achieved in 205 (30.7 %), with no difference between OPEN and MI. ROB independently increased TO (odds ratio, 4.297; p = 0.002), achieving higher MI-TO (37.8 % vs. 23.2 %; p = 0.003), better lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes: 55.3 % vs. 40.6 %; p = 0.009), and fewer OPEN conversions (1.2 % vs. 13.7 %; p < 0.001) than LPS. TO correlated with lower mortality (HR, 0.506; p = 0.001) and recurrence (HR, 0.682; p = 0.027). Conclusion: TO in resectable GbC is achieved in one-third of cases, with significant long-term benefits. MI is effective, with ROB outperforming LPS in MI-TO measures. These results establish a benchmark for centers to enhance outcomes.

Textbook Outcomes and Minimally Invasive Techniques in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Global Cohort Study / Cremona, Simone; Ielpo, Benedetto; di Martino, Marcello; Podda, Mauro; Di Franco, Gregorio; Furbetta, Niccoló; Comandatore, Annalisa; Giuliante, Felice; Aldrighetti, Luca; Martinie, John; Izzo, Francesco; Sukandy, Iswanto; di Benedetto, Fabrizio; Troisi, Roberto; Donadon, Matteo; Ruzzenente, Andrea; Torzilli, Guido; Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo; Morelli, Luca; Benedetto, Ielpo; Burdio, Fernando; Sanchez-Velazquez, Patricia; Cremona, Simone; Fernandez, Laura Linde; Ramon, Maria Villamonte; Morelli, Luca; Furbetta, Niccoló; di Franco, Gregorio; Comandatore, Annalisa; Mastrangelo, Mattia; Mazzone, Chiara; Guadagni, Simone; Masetti, Michele; Offi, Maria Fortuna; Geraldi, Eleonora; Aldrighetti, Luca; Ingallinella, Sara; Ratti, Francesca; Rosso, Edoardo; De Blasi, Vito; Anselmo, Alessandro; Conte, Luigi Eduardo; Memeo, Riccardo; Delvecchio, Antonella; Sukandy, Iswanto; Moraldi, Luca; Grazi, Gian Luca; Spampinato, Marcello G.; D'Ugo, Stefano; Heng Chiow, Adrian Kah; Yi Yee, Francis Zheng; Tan, Hiang Jin; Thiruchelvam, Nita; Lancellotti, Francesco; Satyadas, Thomas; de Liguori, Nicola; Fedi, Massimo; De Vincenti, Rosita; Leo, Francesca; Pesi, Benedetta; Belli, Andrea; Izzo, Francesco; Cutolo, Carmen; Romano, Fabrizio; Scotti, Mauro Alessandro; Carissimi, Francesca; Garancini, Mattia; Ciulli, Cristina; Mazzola, Michele; Ferrari, Giovanni; Zironda, Andrea; Giani, Alessandro; Giuliani, Giuseppe; Federica Dorma, Maria Pia; Guerra, Francesco; Di Marino, Michele; Coratti, Andrea; Mina, Elisa; Romanzi, Andrea; Prieto, Mikel; Perfecto, Arkaitz; Ioannidis, Orestis; Lombardeas, Odysseas; Ardito, Francesco; Giuliante, Felice; Lopez-Lopez, Victor; Robles-Campos, Ricardo; Martinie, John; Mccarron, Frances; Romito, Raffaele; Nicolosi, Filadelfio Massimiliano; Ben Dhaou, Anis; Chamekh, Atef; Rezgui, Bochra; Pacilli, Mario; Pavon, Giovanna; Tartagli, Nicola; Gupta, Rahul; Grego, Davide Giovanni; Ricci, Claudio; Pata, Francesco; Nardo, Bruno; Facundo, Helena; Guevara, Oscar; Lorenzin, Dario; Guglielmi, Alfredo; Ruzzenente, Andrea; Valle, Valentina; Alberto, Mangano; Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo; Vicente, Emilio; Ferri, Valentina; Caruso, Riccardo; Avella, Pasquale; Calise, Fulvio; Rocca, Aldo; Bianchi, Paolo; Rompianesi, Gianluca; Troisi, Roberto I.; Donadon, Matteo; Torzilli, Guido; di Martino, Marcello; Podda, Mauro; Magistri, Paolo; Di Benedetto, Fabrizio; Llerena, Gabriela Chullo; Fàbrega, Joana Ferrer; Goh, Brian K.P.; Koh, Ye Xin; Masuda, Yoshio; Wei, Kongyuan; Vittoria d'Addetta, Maria. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - ELETTRONICO. - 51:(2025), pp. 110284.110284-110284.110296. [10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110284]

Textbook Outcomes and Minimally Invasive Techniques in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Global Cohort Study

Moraldi, Luca
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Grazi, Gian Luca
Methodology
;
Fedi, Massimo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2025

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery for resectable gallbladder cancer (GbC) encompasses complex operative management, and evaluating surgical quality through textbook outcome (TO) is crucial. This study aimed to assess TO incidence and impact in a global cohort, identify independent predictors, and evaluate TO rates of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, including robotic (ROB) and laparoscopic (LPS). Materials and methods: This cohort study included patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy for GbC (T1b–T3) from 2012 to 2023 in 41 hospitals. TO was defined as the absence of intraoperative transfusion, major complications, readmission, reoperation, or 90-day mortality, alongside negative margins and ≥6 retrieved lymph nodes. MI-TO additionally required no conversion. A 1:1 propensity score matching compared TO in open (OPEN) and MI approaches. Data were analyzed from July to November 2024. Results: Among 667 patients (MI, 361; OPEN, 306), TO was achieved in 205 (30.7 %), with no difference between OPEN and MI. ROB independently increased TO (odds ratio, 4.297; p = 0.002), achieving higher MI-TO (37.8 % vs. 23.2 %; p = 0.003), better lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes: 55.3 % vs. 40.6 %; p = 0.009), and fewer OPEN conversions (1.2 % vs. 13.7 %; p < 0.001) than LPS. TO correlated with lower mortality (HR, 0.506; p = 0.001) and recurrence (HR, 0.682; p = 0.027). Conclusion: TO in resectable GbC is achieved in one-third of cases, with significant long-term benefits. MI is effective, with ROB outperforming LPS in MI-TO measures. These results establish a benchmark for centers to enhance outcomes.
2025
51
110284
110296
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Cremona, Simone; Ielpo, Benedetto; di Martino, Marcello; Podda, Mauro; Di Franco, Gregorio; Furbetta, Niccoló; Comandatore, Annalisa; Giuliante, Felic...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Textbook colecisti.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 2.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.5 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1451062
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact