Background: Lung adenocarcinoma exhibits heterogeneity among different histological subtypes, with solid and micropapillary subgroups (classified as high-grade) associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of high-grade adenocarcinoma on survival in patients undergoing intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical-stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer between 2016 and 2023 were reviewed. The adenocarcinoma population was divided and compared based on the presence of high-grade adenocarcinoma >20%, based on the 2021 WHO classification. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test the association between survival and covariates. Results: The adenocarcinoma population included 216 patients, with high-grade adenocarcinoma >20% in 47 (21.7%). A consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.8 was more frequent in the high-grade adenocarcinoma population. Survival analyses showed that overall (5-year OS rate 57% vs. 90%, p < 0.01), cancer-specific (5-year CSS rate 66% vs. 91%, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (5-year DFS rate 53% vs. 75%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in patients with high-grade adenocarcinoma. No significant differences in overall and disease-free survival were observed when compared to a contemporary cohort of lobectomy patients. Recurrence and high-grade pattern (HR 3.26, 95%CI 1.4–7.6, p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for reduced overall survival, whereas high-grade adenocarcinoma >20% (HR 2.43, 95%CI 1.25–4.71, p < 0.01) and a consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.8 were risk factors for reduced disease-free survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of high-grade adenocarcinoma is sub-optimal even in radically treated early-stage patients, and close monitoring and a complete bio-molecular assessment should be advisable in light of a multimodal adjuvant approach. However, the different subtypes of adenocarcinoma could be inserted as a staging parameter in future international staging systems.

Oncologic Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy in Patients with High-Grade Adenocarcinoma Pattern / Bongiolatti, Stefano; Salvicchi, Alberto; Gatteschi, Lavinia; Mugnaini, Giovanni; Tombelli, Simone; Gonfiotti, Alessandro; Voltolini, Luca. - In: LIFE. - ISSN 2075-1729. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:(2025), pp. 339.0-339.12. [10.3390/life15030339]

Oncologic Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy in Patients with High-Grade Adenocarcinoma Pattern

Bongiolatti, Stefano;Salvicchi, Alberto;Gatteschi, Lavinia;Tombelli, Simone;Gonfiotti, Alessandro;Voltolini, Luca
2025

Abstract

Background: Lung adenocarcinoma exhibits heterogeneity among different histological subtypes, with solid and micropapillary subgroups (classified as high-grade) associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of high-grade adenocarcinoma on survival in patients undergoing intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical-stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer between 2016 and 2023 were reviewed. The adenocarcinoma population was divided and compared based on the presence of high-grade adenocarcinoma >20%, based on the 2021 WHO classification. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test the association between survival and covariates. Results: The adenocarcinoma population included 216 patients, with high-grade adenocarcinoma >20% in 47 (21.7%). A consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.8 was more frequent in the high-grade adenocarcinoma population. Survival analyses showed that overall (5-year OS rate 57% vs. 90%, p < 0.01), cancer-specific (5-year CSS rate 66% vs. 91%, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (5-year DFS rate 53% vs. 75%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in patients with high-grade adenocarcinoma. No significant differences in overall and disease-free survival were observed when compared to a contemporary cohort of lobectomy patients. Recurrence and high-grade pattern (HR 3.26, 95%CI 1.4–7.6, p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for reduced overall survival, whereas high-grade adenocarcinoma >20% (HR 2.43, 95%CI 1.25–4.71, p < 0.01) and a consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.8 were risk factors for reduced disease-free survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of high-grade adenocarcinoma is sub-optimal even in radically treated early-stage patients, and close monitoring and a complete bio-molecular assessment should be advisable in light of a multimodal adjuvant approach. However, the different subtypes of adenocarcinoma could be inserted as a staging parameter in future international staging systems.
2025
15
0
12
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Bongiolatti, Stefano; Salvicchi, Alberto; Gatteschi, Lavinia; Mugnaini, Giovanni; Tombelli, Simone; Gonfiotti, Alessandro; Voltolini, Luca
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
life-15-00339.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 2.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.23 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1451200
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact