Understanding the motives behind femicides is crucial to design effective prevention strategies and to support women's self-determination, free from threats to their mental and physical integrity. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter forensic study involving 27 Italian Institutes of Legal Medicine, analyzing 1238 female homicides (1950–2023). Cases were classified as femicide or non-femicide female homicide according to the medico-legal definition of femicide as the murder due to the failure to recognize women's right to self-determination. Motives were categorized into 12 groups, and relevant anamnestic and circumstantial data were collected. Of the 1238 cases, 410 were identified as femicides, 395 as non-femicides, and 433 were excluded for insufficient information. Femicides were most frequently driven by jealousy/rejection (n = 185; 45.1 %) and separation/divorce (n = 144; 35.1 %), often in the context of intimate partner violence or inability to accept the end of a relationship. Non-femicides were predominantly associated with the perpetrator's psychiatric disorder and/or drug addiction (n = 126; 31.9 %), violent aggression without gender-related motive (n = 69; 17.5 %), victim's illness (n = 63; 15.9 %), or economic reasons (n = 58; 14.7 %). In the Italian context, most femicides stem from relational dynamics − particularly jealousy, rejection, and separation − whereas non-femicides are more often linked to psychiatric illness, substance abuse, or non-gender-related aggression. Incorporating these findings into clinical risk assessment protocols, especially in emergency and primary care settings, may help identify women at high risk and guide targeted prevention strategies.
A nationwide forensic case-series of femicides in Italy – Part 1: Clues to the motives of the murder / Cecchi, Rossana; Santunione, Anna Laura; Camatti, Jessika; Buzzelli, Alice; De Martina, Alessandra; Sannella, Alessandra; Vinceti, Marco; Corbi, Graziamaria; Campobasso, Carlo Pietro; Sassani, Matilde; De Fazio, Giovanna Laura; Fais, Paolo; Pelotti, Susi; Giorgetti, Arianna; Lacchè, Elena; Verzeletti, Andrea; Beltrame, Bianca; Zoia, Riccardo; Franceschetti, Lorenzo; Vignali, Giulia; Moreschi, Carlo; Desinan, Lorenzo; Da Broi, Ugo; Zara, Georgia; Gino, Sarah; Bugelli, Valentina; Balduini, Simone; Ginocchio, Debora; Lubian, Elisabetta; Porzio, Antonietta; Cascone, Federica; Viel, Guido; Angiola, Francesco; Introna, Francesco; Sablone, Sara; Calvano, Mariagrazia; Ausania, Francesco; Solari, Luca-Maria; Asmundo, Alessio; Ventura Spagnolo, Elvira; Baldino, Gennaro; Visonà, Silvia Damiana; Bodini, Sofia; Turillazzi, Emanuela; Gabbrielli, Mario; Bacchio, Alice; Argo, Antonina; Malta, Ginevra; D'Aloja, Ernesto; Demontis, Roberto; Gozzelino, Camilla; Sanna, Jessica; Giorgetti, Raffaele; Bora, Federica; Ventura, Francesco; Caristo, Isabella; Oliva, Antonio; Mercuri, Giulia; Pomara, Cristoforo; Salerno, Monica; Cipolloni, Luigi; Pinchi, Vilma; Focardi, Martina; Marsella, Luigi Tonino; Treglia, Michele; Aquila, Isabella; Sacco, Matteo Antonio; Gaudio, Rosamaria; Neri, Margherita; Marino, Raffaella. - In: LEGAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1344-6223. - STAMPA. - 78:(2025), pp. 102703.1-102703.7. [10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102703]
A nationwide forensic case-series of femicides in Italy – Part 1: Clues to the motives of the murder
Pinchi, Vilma;Focardi, Martina;
2025
Abstract
Understanding the motives behind femicides is crucial to design effective prevention strategies and to support women's self-determination, free from threats to their mental and physical integrity. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter forensic study involving 27 Italian Institutes of Legal Medicine, analyzing 1238 female homicides (1950–2023). Cases were classified as femicide or non-femicide female homicide according to the medico-legal definition of femicide as the murder due to the failure to recognize women's right to self-determination. Motives were categorized into 12 groups, and relevant anamnestic and circumstantial data were collected. Of the 1238 cases, 410 were identified as femicides, 395 as non-femicides, and 433 were excluded for insufficient information. Femicides were most frequently driven by jealousy/rejection (n = 185; 45.1 %) and separation/divorce (n = 144; 35.1 %), often in the context of intimate partner violence or inability to accept the end of a relationship. Non-femicides were predominantly associated with the perpetrator's psychiatric disorder and/or drug addiction (n = 126; 31.9 %), violent aggression without gender-related motive (n = 69; 17.5 %), victim's illness (n = 63; 15.9 %), or economic reasons (n = 58; 14.7 %). In the Italian context, most femicides stem from relational dynamics − particularly jealousy, rejection, and separation − whereas non-femicides are more often linked to psychiatric illness, substance abuse, or non-gender-related aggression. Incorporating these findings into clinical risk assessment protocols, especially in emergency and primary care settings, may help identify women at high risk and guide targeted prevention strategies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1344622325001373-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
413.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
413.9 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



