Background: Integrated care models between psychiatry and toxicology specialists are essential for the evaluation and management of patients affected by dual disorders, but their application across mental health and addiction services re-mains inconsistent. Observational studies on the outcomes of these collaborations are necessary to substantiate the ration-ale of this approach. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an integrated treatment approach for patients with dual disorders in public healthcare, highlighting factors that could positively or negatively influence dropout rates. Methods: The research was conducted at the Joint Unit (Psychiatry-Toxicology) of A.O.U. Careggi on 56 patients. Base-line data (T0) included anamnestic, sociodemographic, and clinical information, as well as psychometric scores on several scales. Dropouts were recorded at 2 months (T1) and 6 months (T2). Logistic regression and stepwise forward conditional regression identified risk and protective factors for the interruption of the care pathway within the Joint Unit. Results: At T1, anxiety disorders and high scores in the positive and negative subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) proved to be protective against dropout, while benzodiazepine use disorder and high PANSS general psycho-pathology scores increased risk. At T2, cannabinoid and benzodiazepine use disorders, as well as high PANSS general psychopathology scores, predicted discontinuation, whereas high positive/negative PANSS scores favoured engagement again. Substance-specific treatments, especially opioid agonists, were the strongest protective factor. Conclusions: De-spite its limitations, this study emphasises the importance of early identification of risk and protective factors at the time of patient assessment in integrated care models. Public Significance Statement: This study offers valuable insights into the engagement and dropout patterns of individuals from a dual disorder-dedicated unit, one of the first of its kind in Italy.

Predictors of engagement and dropout in the context of joint treatment for dual disorders: An exploratory analysis / Spagnuolo, Andrea Saverio; Boy, Ottone Baccaredda; Noschese, Ilaria; Porcinai, Niccolò; Elia, Ferdinando; Castellini, Giovanni; Rotella, Francesco; Ricca, Valdo; Lanzi, Cecilia; Occupati, Brunella; Maremmani, Icro; Mannaioni, Guido; Ballerini, Andrea. - In: HEROIN ADDICTION AND RELATED CLINICAL PROBLEMS. - ISSN 1592-1638. - ELETTRONICO. - 27:(2025), pp. 22.1-22.10. [10.62401/2531-4122-2025-22]

Predictors of engagement and dropout in the context of joint treatment for dual disorders: An exploratory analysis

Spagnuolo, Andrea Saverio
;
Boy, Ottone Baccaredda;Noschese, Ilaria;Elia, Ferdinando;Castellini, Giovanni;Rotella, Francesco;Ricca, Valdo;Lanzi, Cecilia;Occupati, Brunella;Maremmani, Icro;Mannaioni, Guido;Ballerini, Andrea
2025

Abstract

Background: Integrated care models between psychiatry and toxicology specialists are essential for the evaluation and management of patients affected by dual disorders, but their application across mental health and addiction services re-mains inconsistent. Observational studies on the outcomes of these collaborations are necessary to substantiate the ration-ale of this approach. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an integrated treatment approach for patients with dual disorders in public healthcare, highlighting factors that could positively or negatively influence dropout rates. Methods: The research was conducted at the Joint Unit (Psychiatry-Toxicology) of A.O.U. Careggi on 56 patients. Base-line data (T0) included anamnestic, sociodemographic, and clinical information, as well as psychometric scores on several scales. Dropouts were recorded at 2 months (T1) and 6 months (T2). Logistic regression and stepwise forward conditional regression identified risk and protective factors for the interruption of the care pathway within the Joint Unit. Results: At T1, anxiety disorders and high scores in the positive and negative subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) proved to be protective against dropout, while benzodiazepine use disorder and high PANSS general psycho-pathology scores increased risk. At T2, cannabinoid and benzodiazepine use disorders, as well as high PANSS general psychopathology scores, predicted discontinuation, whereas high positive/negative PANSS scores favoured engagement again. Substance-specific treatments, especially opioid agonists, were the strongest protective factor. Conclusions: De-spite its limitations, this study emphasises the importance of early identification of risk and protective factors at the time of patient assessment in integrated care models. Public Significance Statement: This study offers valuable insights into the engagement and dropout patterns of individuals from a dual disorder-dedicated unit, one of the first of its kind in Italy.
2025
27
1
10
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Spagnuolo, Andrea Saverio; Boy, Ottone Baccaredda; Noschese, Ilaria; Porcinai, Niccolò; Elia, Ferdinando; Castellini, Giovanni; Rotella, Francesco; Ri...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025 Predittori Doppia Diagnosi.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 3.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.04 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1455156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact