This study examines Italian adolescents’ willingness to use electronic devices rather than printed paper for reading and writing activities, a behavioural choice that differs from more conventional pro-environmental actions due to its implications for learning and well-being. We design an online vignette experiment with two informational conditions: an individual-impact and a social-impact treatment. Socially framed information is associated with a higher propensity to prefer digital tools relative to individual framing, although overall treatment effects are modest. Stronger treatment responsiveness emerges only when students reflect on avoidable printing practices. Preferences are primarily shaped by socio-demographic factors, particularly gender, educational background, and health and environmental attitudes. Paper is valued for its perceived benefits to reasoning, memory, and reading enjoyment, while digital tools are favoured for their ease of writing and editing. Even if not fully generalizable, our findings highlight the atypical nature of a paper–digital trade-off: when consumption choices involve cognitive or identity-related considerations, sustainability-based messages alone may be insufficient.

Paper–Digital Trade-Offs: Preliminary Insights from a Framing Experiment with Italian Adolescents / Gabriele Lombardi, Alessio Muscillo, Elena Sestini, Francesca Garbin, Paolo Pin. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026), pp. 0-0.

Paper–Digital Trade-Offs: Preliminary Insights from a Framing Experiment with Italian Adolescents

Gabriele Lombardi
;
Elena Sestini;Paolo Pin
2026

Abstract

This study examines Italian adolescents’ willingness to use electronic devices rather than printed paper for reading and writing activities, a behavioural choice that differs from more conventional pro-environmental actions due to its implications for learning and well-being. We design an online vignette experiment with two informational conditions: an individual-impact and a social-impact treatment. Socially framed information is associated with a higher propensity to prefer digital tools relative to individual framing, although overall treatment effects are modest. Stronger treatment responsiveness emerges only when students reflect on avoidable printing practices. Preferences are primarily shaped by socio-demographic factors, particularly gender, educational background, and health and environmental attitudes. Paper is valued for its perceived benefits to reasoning, memory, and reading enjoyment, while digital tools are favoured for their ease of writing and editing. Even if not fully generalizable, our findings highlight the atypical nature of a paper–digital trade-off: when consumption choices involve cognitive or identity-related considerations, sustainability-based messages alone may be insufficient.
2026
0
0
Gabriele Lombardi, Alessio Muscillo, Elena Sestini, Francesca Garbin, Paolo Pin
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sustainability-18-02180.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 541.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
541.45 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1456413
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact