Multi-link terrestrial backhauls create a shared transport environment in which heterogeneous multipath protocols compete for the same forwarding resources while reacting to congestion with different control logics. In this paper, we investigate this problem in a 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul (IAB) scenario where an IAB node aggregates traffic from multiple User Equipments (UEs) and forwards it toward the core network over two terrestrial backhaul paths. We focus on the coexistence of Multipath TCP (MPTCP) and Multipath QUIC (MPQUIC), evaluating how cross-protocol Congestion Control (CC) pairings affect performance. Specifically, all feasible BBR, CUBIC, and Reno cross-pairings are assessed under symmetric and asymmetric dual-backhaul conditions, considering Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) and dense low-rate traffic regimes representative of mMTC-like operation. The analysis considers throughput, Jain’s fairness index, jitter , and packet loss to identify the trade-offs of each CC pairing. Results show that CC selection is a first-order design factor in MPTCP/MPQUIC coexistence over shared backhauls. No single pairing is uniformly optimal across all metrics: some configurations provide more balanced throughput sharing, others improve fairness, while the most favorable solutions for jitter do not necessarily maximize transport efficiency. These findings identify CC pairing as a tuning dimension for multi-link backhaul systems based on heterogeneous multipath transports.

Joint Congestion Control Evaluation for MPTCP and MPQUIC over Multi-Link Backhauls with eMBB and mMTC-Like Traffic / Picchi, Roberto; Tarchi, Daniele. - In: ELECTRONICS. - ISSN 2079-9292. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:(2026), pp. 1797.1-1797.37. [10.3390/electronics15091797]

Joint Congestion Control Evaluation for MPTCP and MPQUIC over Multi-Link Backhauls with eMBB and mMTC-Like Traffic

Picchi, Roberto;Tarchi, Daniele
2026

Abstract

Multi-link terrestrial backhauls create a shared transport environment in which heterogeneous multipath protocols compete for the same forwarding resources while reacting to congestion with different control logics. In this paper, we investigate this problem in a 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul (IAB) scenario where an IAB node aggregates traffic from multiple User Equipments (UEs) and forwards it toward the core network over two terrestrial backhaul paths. We focus on the coexistence of Multipath TCP (MPTCP) and Multipath QUIC (MPQUIC), evaluating how cross-protocol Congestion Control (CC) pairings affect performance. Specifically, all feasible BBR, CUBIC, and Reno cross-pairings are assessed under symmetric and asymmetric dual-backhaul conditions, considering Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) and dense low-rate traffic regimes representative of mMTC-like operation. The analysis considers throughput, Jain’s fairness index, jitter , and packet loss to identify the trade-offs of each CC pairing. Results show that CC selection is a first-order design factor in MPTCP/MPQUIC coexistence over shared backhauls. No single pairing is uniformly optimal across all metrics: some configurations provide more balanced throughput sharing, others improve fairness, while the most favorable solutions for jitter do not necessarily maximize transport efficiency. These findings identify CC pairing as a tuning dimension for multi-link backhaul systems based on heterogeneous multipath transports.
2026
15
1
37
Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals
Picchi, Roberto; Tarchi, Daniele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
electronics-15-01797.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.66 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1466213
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact