This article explores how collective bargaining addresses workforce ageing by comparing sectoral agreements in Italy and the Netherlands. The study investigates whether workers aged 55 and over are effectively represented in sectoral bargaining and what regulatory logics underpin age-sensitive provisions. Through a systematic content analysis of the most representative sectoral agreements in both countries, complemented by interviews with unions and employers’ associations, the paper identifies five bargaining logics – defensive, transformative, symbolic, adaptive, and exit-oriented – and maps how they emerge across institutional contexts. The findings reveal that Dutch agreements contain a high number of age-related provisions primarily guided by an adaptive logic aimed at sustaining employability through organisational adjustments, while Italian agreements include fewer clauses, most of which are symbolic. The paper explains differences by considering the interaction among three causal packages based on the Varieties of Capitalism literature, the Power Resource Approach, and Ideational Institutionalism. The analysis shows that strong coordination and shared ideas about senior workers as valuable resources enable more proactive bargaining, whereas fragmented systems and a perception of senior workers as close to retirement limit regulatory innovation. The article concludes by highlighting the need for more substantive strategies to address demographic change through collective bargaining.

Collective bargaining in the age of demographic transition: Regulating an ageing workforce in Italy and the Netherlands / Burroni, L., Raspanti, D., Cavallini, G.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. - ISSN 0959-6801. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026), pp. 09596801261464277.1-09596801261464277.22. [10.1177/09596801261464277]

Collective bargaining in the age of demographic transition: Regulating an ageing workforce in Italy and the Netherlands

Burroni, Luigi;Raspanti, Dario
;
Cavallini, Giulia
2026

Abstract

This article explores how collective bargaining addresses workforce ageing by comparing sectoral agreements in Italy and the Netherlands. The study investigates whether workers aged 55 and over are effectively represented in sectoral bargaining and what regulatory logics underpin age-sensitive provisions. Through a systematic content analysis of the most representative sectoral agreements in both countries, complemented by interviews with unions and employers’ associations, the paper identifies five bargaining logics – defensive, transformative, symbolic, adaptive, and exit-oriented – and maps how they emerge across institutional contexts. The findings reveal that Dutch agreements contain a high number of age-related provisions primarily guided by an adaptive logic aimed at sustaining employability through organisational adjustments, while Italian agreements include fewer clauses, most of which are symbolic. The paper explains differences by considering the interaction among three causal packages based on the Varieties of Capitalism literature, the Power Resource Approach, and Ideational Institutionalism. The analysis shows that strong coordination and shared ideas about senior workers as valuable resources enable more proactive bargaining, whereas fragmented systems and a perception of senior workers as close to retirement limit regulatory innovation. The article concludes by highlighting the need for more substantive strategies to address demographic change through collective bargaining.
2026
1
22
Burroni, Luigi; Raspanti, Dario; Cavallini, Giulia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Burroni et al (2026) EJIR-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 73.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
73.44 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1480692
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact