Dissipative bracing (DB) systems are among the most sustainable seismic retrofit strategies of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures. Indeed, they allow to minimize the use of materials and the architectural impact, as well as emphasize the reversibility of the interventions and the reuse of the elements and components with which they are made. Research studies on DBbased seismic retrofit strategies usually focus on the application of single systems incorporating a specific type of damper. In order to offer a broader perspective on this class of technologies, a comparative study of two different DB systems is presented in this article. One system is equipped with Added Damping and Stiffness (ADAS) steel dissipators and the other one with Pressurized Fluid Viscous (PFV) spring-dampers. A representative case study is examined, i.e. a 6-storey building located in a medium-high seismicity zone in Italy, designed according to the 1986 edition of the National Seismic Standards. Expeditious criteria recently proposed by the authors are adopted to pre-size the two systems, applied for the first time here by including the infills in the time-history performance evaluation analyses. The article reports: the results of the seismic assessment study of the building; recalls on the presizing criteria of the two DB systems and the results of their application; a comparative analysis of the performance improvement of structural members and infills attained by the two retrofit solutions, with notes on possible different design choices of the ADAS and PFV dissipators; and evaluations on the cost and the architectural impact and sustainability of the two interventions.

Dissipative bracing solutions for sustainable seismic retrofit of RC structures / Gloria Terenzi, Stefano Sorace, Ylenia Catullo. - In: SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURES. - ISSN 2789-312X. - STAMPA. - 2027:(2026), pp. 000121.1-000121.22. [10.54113/j.sust.2027.000121]

Dissipative bracing solutions for sustainable seismic retrofit of RC structures

Gloria Terenzi;
2026

Abstract

Dissipative bracing (DB) systems are among the most sustainable seismic retrofit strategies of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures. Indeed, they allow to minimize the use of materials and the architectural impact, as well as emphasize the reversibility of the interventions and the reuse of the elements and components with which they are made. Research studies on DBbased seismic retrofit strategies usually focus on the application of single systems incorporating a specific type of damper. In order to offer a broader perspective on this class of technologies, a comparative study of two different DB systems is presented in this article. One system is equipped with Added Damping and Stiffness (ADAS) steel dissipators and the other one with Pressurized Fluid Viscous (PFV) spring-dampers. A representative case study is examined, i.e. a 6-storey building located in a medium-high seismicity zone in Italy, designed according to the 1986 edition of the National Seismic Standards. Expeditious criteria recently proposed by the authors are adopted to pre-size the two systems, applied for the first time here by including the infills in the time-history performance evaluation analyses. The article reports: the results of the seismic assessment study of the building; recalls on the presizing criteria of the two DB systems and the results of their application; a comparative analysis of the performance improvement of structural members and infills attained by the two retrofit solutions, with notes on possible different design choices of the ADAS and PFV dissipators; and evaluations on the cost and the architectural impact and sustainability of the two interventions.
2026
2027
1
22
Gloria Terenzi; Stefano Sorace; Ylenia Catullo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SUST-26-0325-20260802_REVISED FINAL.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo in pubblicazione
Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.79 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia all'autore

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1487475
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact