Background: Ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) is indicated for adults with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, a subset of patients may exhibit a suboptimal response due to persistent PI3K/AKT activation. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LIMBER-304 study (NCT04551053) investigated the efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib (highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or declining response to stable ruxolitinib monotherapy. Patients and Methods: Adults with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who received ruxolitinib with palpable spleen and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) ≥10 were eligible. Primary end point was proportion of patients achieving ≥25% spleen volume reduction (SVR; baseline to week 24); key secondary end point was proportion of patients with ≥50% MFSAF-TSS reduction (baseline to week 24). Results: In total, 90 patients received parsaclisib/ruxolitinib; 87 received placebo/ruxolitinib. At week 24, 16.7% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib achieved ≥25% SVR vs 9.7% for placebo/ruxolitinib; this difference was not statistically significant. By week 24, ≥50% reduction in MFSAF-TSS was observed in 17.1% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 14.1% for placebo/ruxolitinib. Higher rates of infections (including cytomegalovirus) and gastrointestinal disorders were observed with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60.0% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 42.5% with placebo/ruxolitinib. The study was terminated early based on efficacy findings. Conclusions: Study results suggested adding parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib was unlikely to offer clinically meaningful benefits. Further research is needed on the potential of JAK and PI3K inhibitor-based combination therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.

Add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: a randomized phase 3 study / Kiladjian, J., Borate, U., Abruzzese, E., De Stefano, V., Gong, T., Breccia, M., Palandri, F., Pane, F., Patriarca, A., Reikvam, H., Rein, L., Yacoub, A., Zhou, F., Stouffs, M., Assad, A., Vannucchi, A.M.. - In: THE ONCOLOGIST. - ISSN 1083-7159. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:(2026), pp. oyag201.1-oyag201.12. [10.1093/oncolo/oyag201]

Add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: a randomized phase 3 study

Palandri, Francesca;Vannucchi, Alessandro Maria
2026

Abstract

Background: Ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) is indicated for adults with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, a subset of patients may exhibit a suboptimal response due to persistent PI3K/AKT activation. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LIMBER-304 study (NCT04551053) investigated the efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib (highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or declining response to stable ruxolitinib monotherapy. Patients and Methods: Adults with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who received ruxolitinib with palpable spleen and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) ≥10 were eligible. Primary end point was proportion of patients achieving ≥25% spleen volume reduction (SVR; baseline to week 24); key secondary end point was proportion of patients with ≥50% MFSAF-TSS reduction (baseline to week 24). Results: In total, 90 patients received parsaclisib/ruxolitinib; 87 received placebo/ruxolitinib. At week 24, 16.7% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib achieved ≥25% SVR vs 9.7% for placebo/ruxolitinib; this difference was not statistically significant. By week 24, ≥50% reduction in MFSAF-TSS was observed in 17.1% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 14.1% for placebo/ruxolitinib. Higher rates of infections (including cytomegalovirus) and gastrointestinal disorders were observed with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60.0% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 42.5% with placebo/ruxolitinib. The study was terminated early based on efficacy findings. Conclusions: Study results suggested adding parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib was unlikely to offer clinically meaningful benefits. Further research is needed on the potential of JAK and PI3K inhibitor-based combination therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.
2026
31
1
12
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques; Borate, Uma; Abruzzese, Elisabetta; De Stefano, Valerio; Gong, Tiejun; Breccia, Massimo; Palandri, Francesca; Pane, Fabrizio;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
oyag201.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.54 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1500293
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact