Objectives: To assess upper-limb spasticity after stroke by means of clinical and instrumental tools and to identify possible variables influencing the clinical pattern. Design: Descriptive measurement study of a consecutive sample of patients with upper-limb spasticity after stroke. Setting: Neurorehabilitation hospital. Participants: Sixty-five poststroke hemiplegic patients. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Upper-limb spasticity, as assessed clinically (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS], articular goniometry) and neurophysiologically (maximum H-reflex [Hmax], maximum M response [Mmax], Hmax/Mmax ratio). Results: Poorer MAS scores were associated with lower passive range of motion (PROM) values at the wrist (P_.01) and elbow (P_.002). The flexor carpi radialis Hmax/Mmax ratio correlated directly with MAS scores at the wrist (P_.005) and correlated inversely with PROM. The presence of pain in the fingers, wrist, and elbow was significantly associated only with lower PROM values at the wrist. Conclusions: Upper-limb spasticity is involved in the development of articular PROM limitation after a stroke. Pain appears to be related to PROM reduction as well, but the exact causal relationship between these 2 factors is still unclear. The MAS and the Hmax/Mmax ratio correlated when evaluating poststroke spasticity; they characterize 2 different aspects of spasticity, clinical and neurophysiologic, respectively, and they could be used as an integrated approach to study and follow poststroke patients.

Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiologic study / A. PIZZI; G. CARLUCCI; C. FALSINI; S. VERDESCA; A. GRIPPO. - In: ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION. - ISSN 0003-9993. - STAMPA. - 86:(2005), pp. 410-415.

Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiologic study.

CARLUCCI, GIOVANNA;GRIPPO, ANTONELLO
2005

Abstract

Objectives: To assess upper-limb spasticity after stroke by means of clinical and instrumental tools and to identify possible variables influencing the clinical pattern. Design: Descriptive measurement study of a consecutive sample of patients with upper-limb spasticity after stroke. Setting: Neurorehabilitation hospital. Participants: Sixty-five poststroke hemiplegic patients. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Upper-limb spasticity, as assessed clinically (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS], articular goniometry) and neurophysiologically (maximum H-reflex [Hmax], maximum M response [Mmax], Hmax/Mmax ratio). Results: Poorer MAS scores were associated with lower passive range of motion (PROM) values at the wrist (P_.01) and elbow (P_.002). The flexor carpi radialis Hmax/Mmax ratio correlated directly with MAS scores at the wrist (P_.005) and correlated inversely with PROM. The presence of pain in the fingers, wrist, and elbow was significantly associated only with lower PROM values at the wrist. Conclusions: Upper-limb spasticity is involved in the development of articular PROM limitation after a stroke. Pain appears to be related to PROM reduction as well, but the exact causal relationship between these 2 factors is still unclear. The MAS and the Hmax/Mmax ratio correlated when evaluating poststroke spasticity; they characterize 2 different aspects of spasticity, clinical and neurophysiologic, respectively, and they could be used as an integrated approach to study and follow poststroke patients.
2005
86
410
415
A. PIZZI; G. CARLUCCI; C. FALSINI; S. VERDESCA; A. GRIPPO
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
5-Arch Phys Med Rehabil2_05.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 130.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
130.76 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/205560
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact