The aim of this article is to discuss the relationship between economic sociology and economic policies. In the last few decades, economic sociology has made significant achievements in terms of theory and research, but its influence on policies has remained weak. While this was inevitable in earlier decades, when scholars had to concentrate most of their effort on defining the role and contribution of economic sociology, it has since become a constraint for the institutionalization and recognition of the discipline. The return to economic sociology, since the 1980s, has brought about important theoretical achievements, especially in the analysis of economic organization at the micro level in terms of social and cultural embeddedness. The role of social relations in contemporary economy has clearly emerged, but its implications for policies to promote economic development have remained more latent so far. Although a weaker institutionalization and a poorer connection to policy-making certainly affect the political influence of economic sociology in comparison to economics, the article focuses on the research perspective. A shift of the research focus from the statics to the dynamics of economic organization could be useful. In this framework, particular attention is drawn to the study of local development and innovation through a closer relationship of economic sociology with comparative political economy. A separation between these two approaches does not favour a full exploitation of the potential contribution of economic sociology to policies.

Unbalanced Growth: Why is Economic Sociology Stronger in Theory than in Policies? / C. TRIGILIA. - In: CURRENT SOCIOLOGY. - ISSN 0011-3921. - STAMPA. - 1:(2007), pp. 59-74. [10.1177/0011392107070134]

Unbalanced Growth: Why is Economic Sociology Stronger in Theory than in Policies?

TRIGILIA, CARLO
2007

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the relationship between economic sociology and economic policies. In the last few decades, economic sociology has made significant achievements in terms of theory and research, but its influence on policies has remained weak. While this was inevitable in earlier decades, when scholars had to concentrate most of their effort on defining the role and contribution of economic sociology, it has since become a constraint for the institutionalization and recognition of the discipline. The return to economic sociology, since the 1980s, has brought about important theoretical achievements, especially in the analysis of economic organization at the micro level in terms of social and cultural embeddedness. The role of social relations in contemporary economy has clearly emerged, but its implications for policies to promote economic development have remained more latent so far. Although a weaker institutionalization and a poorer connection to policy-making certainly affect the political influence of economic sociology in comparison to economics, the article focuses on the research perspective. A shift of the research focus from the statics to the dynamics of economic organization could be useful. In this framework, particular attention is drawn to the study of local development and innovation through a closer relationship of economic sociology with comparative political economy. A separation between these two approaches does not favour a full exploitation of the potential contribution of economic sociology to policies.
2007
1
59
74
C. TRIGILIA
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unbalanced growth Trigilia 2007.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 129.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
129.08 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/224558
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact